rbt
Senior Member
Looking at their 2011 Annual report (http://www.viarail.ca/sites/all/fil...-reports/2011/VIA-Rail-Annual-Report-2011.pdf).
They slice them up 2 different ways. Ticket revenue (before snack carts, baggage fees, penalty/change fees?) leaves Corridor at about 30% subsidy.
BUT when you compare "Passenger Revenues per Available Seat-Mile" against "Direct Costs per Available Seat-Mile" Corridor East looks to be break-even and Corridor-West has about a 20% subsidy.
So what is an indirect cost? Head office?
I took a number of trips on the Canadian and Ocean in 2009/2010. Glad I did as they charge nearly 150% more for the same trip in the same time of year now ($1200 instead of $500).
Q1 2012 looks quite a bit worse than Q1 2011 financially. Costs are up and revenues are down.
http://www.viarail.ca/sites/all/fil...artely-reports/2012/en-Q1-quartely-report.pdf
They slice them up 2 different ways. Ticket revenue (before snack carts, baggage fees, penalty/change fees?) leaves Corridor at about 30% subsidy.
BUT when you compare "Passenger Revenues per Available Seat-Mile" against "Direct Costs per Available Seat-Mile" Corridor East looks to be break-even and Corridor-West has about a 20% subsidy.
So what is an indirect cost? Head office?
I took a number of trips on the Canadian and Ocean in 2009/2010. Glad I did as they charge nearly 150% more for the same trip in the same time of year now ($1200 instead of $500).
Q1 2012 looks quite a bit worse than Q1 2011 financially. Costs are up and revenues are down.
http://www.viarail.ca/sites/all/fil...artely-reports/2012/en-Q1-quartely-report.pdf
Last edited: