Tulse
Senior Member
And here is exactly what I was talking about. This kind of analysis is done by virtually every commuter in the outer 416. Yet, somehow, transit fans and transit planners can't seem to relate or don't seem to care.
Do you really think that the key observation that "Driving is far more expensive, but it’s also faster" is somehow a radical and novel revelation? I don't understand the author's, and thus your, complaint. There is simply no way to make transit faster than point-to-point driving for all circumstances, or likely even the majority of circumstances. What do you suggest transit planners do -- create publicly funded transporter beams?