fiendishlibrarian
Active Member
Related to this, upcoming changes to provincial regulations:
GoodRelated to this, upcoming changes to provincial regulations:
Proposed New Regulation under the Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act, 2025 (RPCISA) to Extend Authorities to Transit Special Constables
Related to this, upcoming changes to provincial regulations:
Proposed New Regulation under the Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act, 2025 (RPCISA) to Extend Authorities to Transit Special Constables
Good
Nice in theory, but i'd love to see nothing is going to change unfortunately.Related to this, upcoming changes to provincial regulations:
Proposed New Regulation under the Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act, 2025 (RPCISA) to Extend Authorities to Transit Special Constables
I'm not directly familiar with the Act but, based on a quick review; although the word "use" does appear in the legislation, the actual substantive section does employ the word 'consume':I'm fine w/this, but my read of the proposal itself is that it doesn't' change anything substantive.
From the proposal itself:
Under the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019, special constables are appointed by police service boards or the Commissioner of the OPP. The authorities of a special constable employed by an authorized public transit special constable employer may include enforcing the Criminal Code, and Ontario provincial statutes such as the Mental Health Act, Trespass to Property Act, and Liquor Licence and Control Act, 2019.
That means they already have the authority to trespass someone, which can include arrest if violating a trespass order. They also already have authority to charge under the criminal code; and possession is an offense. They can also charge under the Mental Health Act if someone is clearly not in their right mind; and presumably they can also charge for public intoxication which is under the above mentioned Liquor License and Control Act, if applicable.
I suppose 'use' might not be expressly covered under the above. But I think @lenaitch should be consulted on that.
My instinct is that any issue here is the management directive on escalation and use of force rather than a statutory one, but perhaps I'm wrong on that.
Apparently the 510 will be out of commission for a few days
This doesn't bode well for the world cup.
???
The World Cup that doesn't start for another 4 months, you mean????
Considering that the article is so limited on actual information as to be almost worthless, you don't actually know what the cause of the outage is. And for the record, neither do I.To give some context, when Bathurst had a major service increase recently they suffered power supply issues which knocked out the line.
Now, a similar situation is happening to Spadina for different reasons.
My point was that if we start experiencing power supply issues for the streetcar lines, it is a bad sign for the increased services required for the world cup. The last thing you want is increased service to overload the power supply during a high profile event.
Considering that the article is so limited on actual information as to be almost worthless, you don't actually know what the cause of the outage is. And for the record, neither do I.
For all we know, it may be a water intrusion issue with all the freezing and thawing (and freezing) that we've had over the past week plus. It certainly isn't service improvements, because there's been none of those in the past week on Spadina. And it isn't because of a system overload, because they've run other routes into Spadina in the past without any faults.
Dan
Sure. It would really suck if our water system failed in May or June for example.Fair enough but the last thing you want is failed infrastructure and major replacement the month before the World Cup.
Why? The matches are months away.This doesn't bode well for the world cup.
https://www.cp24.com/local/toronto/...ely-be-out-of-service-for-couple-of-days-ttc/
Underground power that gets directed to the catenaries?CP24 says it's underground issues, but CBC says it's overhead issues. Both cite the TTC as their source.
...so which is it?




