T3G
Senior Member
Yes, of course infrastructure gets old and wears out. But what is being done about it? Considering what shut down the SRT, and the litany of slow orders that were "discovered" on the subway in the wake of that incident, why should we believe that those in charge have got it all under control? If they had things under control, I would think the SRT would not have shut down in the spectacular way that it did (derailments not being standard practice), and all the slow orders on the subway would have been taken care of long before it got to the point where trains had to run at reduced speeds in the first place.Laughing at "these days". Infrastructure gets old and media produce panic stories about it. This is a 1990's Global News special. Children watch and declare it's the fault of The Rich. Old people watch and declare "nothing was ever broken in my day." Both are wrong.
Also, Steve is getting much more histrionic in his golden years.
You say it's not the fault of the Rich (of course, I never laid this result at the feet of the rich generally, but specifically at neoliberal politics that promote austerity). Who's fault is it, then? Please explain at length your theory. What I see is that public institutions like the TTC are routinely, and chronically, underfunded. Did we think nothing was going to happen as a consequence? That without the proper funding we'd be able to keep up proper maintenance standards? What are they supposed to deliver with resources being cut back?




