Amare
Senior Member
I'm being very kind in saying that the TTC has a very troubling history of properly using the ridership/fare data they have on hand, which as you alluded to can be very accurate whichever the method may be. Especially when compared to 20 years ago.Which, by the way is why the TTC is showing ridership levels 'below actual'; even though they are capable of seeing actual to a great degree, because the combination of 'Vision' software, step counters; and if they are using them, axle weight monitors can clearly show the real load factor.
TTC: There's lots of room on our subways in late evenings, our fare data shows a decline in riders.
Riders: The train leaving Y/B could barely board all the people on the platform, there are more standees than paid passengers
Reality: The TTC counts different ways depending on who they are talking to and what they are aiming to achieve or cover up.
They have the data on hand, but fail in virtually every way to actually use it properly to address the bigger issues that they face. For instance, they know where the highest amounts of fare evasion happen across the city, but we'll be damned if they actually put fare inspectors in those areas more frequently. Let alone get fare inspectors out across the system in general (which is needed in general because if you dont have a deterrence mechanism in place, the problem will only magnify).
Regarding ridership data, the way they use it is a laughable joke.




