That internet says...
There are a few reasons why a railroad might choose concrete ties over wood ties, but generally they all boil down to economics. Concrete ties are a fairly new development, at least when compared to the many decades when ties were exclusively made of wood. Replacing wood ties with concrete ones is not an easy nor inexpensive task, so you mainly find concrete on lines that were built or rebuilt within the past few decades. When wood ties are damaged or wear out, it’s just easier to replace them with new wood ties rather than rebuild and re-ballast the whole track.
There’s also the matter of long term versus short term costs. Concrete ties are heavier than wood, more expensive to make and lay, and require better roadbed and ballast than many existing lines may have. Wood also does a good job at electrically isolating the rails from each other, important for signal detection. And while it’s true that concrete is more long lasting than wood, wood is more resilient to damage. Dragging equipment or a derailment that would bang up a wood tie might crack an unyielding concrete tie in half, rendering it useless. Because of this, railroads tend to place dragging-equipment detectors closer together in concrete-tie territory.