TheTigerMaster
Superstar
Right, that's nfitz point. The author created an approximation and not a scaled down representation of what is actually built. You can't put a single dot on the map for a station like Spadina to cover both lines. That single dot is going to be in the wrong place for one line or the other.
You can't draw the line in the wrong location and call it a scale representation of reality.
This is getting a little ridiculous. The author did an amazing job. So what if he misplaced a station by a few hundred meters? It's certainly not worth all this argument. We might as well be complaining about the inexact curve radius.