old boy
Senior Member
I guess you can't satisfy everyone. We were happy for 30+ storeys back when joined urbantoronto. Sure the world has seen an explosion in height since however, most places would be very happy to see a 20 storey tower get off the ground in the current economic climate. There are seven 200+ metres towers under construction right now in the downtown. Also, The lot coverage of many developments is on the extremely high side making for a very dense urban experience regardless if they only manage 100 metres in height.
Bay Adelaide Centre as well as the financial core fall under Nathan Phillps Square shadowing policy. I'm sure many will disagree however, I think limiting additonal shadowing on are greatest (embarassingly neglected) civic attribute is well worth the trade off of slightly shorter heights. Our compact financial core is still one of the densest areas in North America. It has massive wind tunnels and few areas where direct sunlight penetrates. It is surprisingly small in area which allowing additional height wouldn't resolve.
We have been and continue to be spoiled and I get the feeling many that don't remember the mid-90s appreciate it.
One taller tower at BAC would have given a more interesting balance to the downtown skyline in my opinion. Instead what we will eventually have on this site is 3 relatively dwarfish boxes, in disappointing relation to the densely spaced bank towers. I sympathize with the shadowing issue on Nathan Phillips Square , but it certainly limits what might have been an impressive addition to the Toronto skyline. The greater downtown area needs an infusion of superior architecture, and yes, height as well. Some recent developments downtown could have been built anywhere along the 401 drag.