Despite it being orthodoxy amongst many on UT, I don't believe that first sentence is true. aA has shown that when the developer wants something a little more out-there, aA delivers something not quite as simple, (yet which still has aA discipline). Take Smart House: it cannot be mistaken for any other building going up, with its angles and bold red stripes. The same uniqueness will hold true for Sixty Colborne, as it did for the Harbour Plaza towers, as it did for Theatre Park… and so on. It's just when you pair aA with a developer like Cresford who really wants it minimalist that the buildings are tougher to distinguish between (and even then, a practiced eye will still be able to tell them apart).
42