sche
Active Member
Seeing the talk about the dental office, I'm just gonna leave this here:
Alon Levy's recent blog post (here) about the planned renovation of Washington Union Station.
I would suggest reading the whole thing (actually, Alon Levy's blog in general) but here are the most important bits:
Alon Levy's recent blog post (here) about the planned renovation of Washington Union Station.
I would suggest reading the whole thing (actually, Alon Levy's blog in general) but here are the most important bits:
What are the features of good train stations?
A train station is interface between passengers and trains. Everything about their construction must serve this purpose. This includes the following features:
...
- Platforms that can effectively connect to the trains (Union Station has a mix of high and low platforms; all platforms used by Northeast Corridor trains must be raised).
- Minimum distance from platform to street or to urban transit.
- Some concessions and seats for travelers, all in an open area.
- Ticketing machines.
- An information booth with maps of the area and station facilities.
- Nothing more.
What are the features of Washington Union Station expansion?
The presentation highlights the following features:
All of the above are wasteful. Connections to H Street can be handled through direct egress points from the platforms to the street, and passengers can get between H Street and the main historic station via those egress points and the platforms themselves. The platforms are key circulation spaces at a train station and using them for passenger movements is normal; I can see an argument against that if the platforms are unusually narrow or crowded, as is the case in New York, but in Washington there is no such excuse.
- A new concourse beneath the platforms.
- A new concourse on H Street with a prominent headhouse, with bus and streetcar connections.
- An enclosed bus facility.
- Underground parking.
- Future air rights development.
...
The plan should be rejected in its entirety and no further funding should be committed to it. Good transit activists should demand that spending on public transportation and intercity rail go to those purposes and not toward building unnecessary train halls. Moreover, it is unlikely the managers at Amtrak who pushed for it and who still are the client for the project understand modern rail operations, nor is it likely that they will ever learn. With neither need nor use for the project, it should be canceled and the people involved in its management and supervision laid off.