In most views from the west now, this does not look like it's Robarts at all, just a new building adjacent to it.
Maybe it's best looked at that way, because adding anything to Robarts is a no-win situation. If the design of the new section were one that was more reminiscent of the existing Robarts building, we'd get other members screaming "no more brutalist buildings" or "trying to pretend it was built years ago" or something like that. Although it's possible that another design could have more people rally behind it, there's ample precedent on UT to show that there's simply no design that would bring everyone, maybe even a majority of members on board.
At least this is up against the quieter and less idiosyncratic west side where it does not impinge on any of the classic views of Robarts from St George and Hoskin.
42
Maybe it's best looked at that way, because adding anything to Robarts is a no-win situation. If the design of the new section were one that was more reminiscent of the existing Robarts building, we'd get other members screaming "no more brutalist buildings" or "trying to pretend it was built years ago" or something like that. Although it's possible that another design could have more people rally behind it, there's ample precedent on UT to show that there's simply no design that would bring everyone, maybe even a majority of members on board.
At least this is up against the quieter and less idiosyncratic west side where it does not impinge on any of the classic views of Robarts from St George and Hoskin.
42