All sides are equally grotesque. Overall, the massing and quality of material and design is atrocious.The Front and Sherbourne sides of this perverse monster are nothing less than grotesque absurdity.
So true!First, I'll admit I'm the epitome of a layman in terms of opinion on buildings.
That said, I feel like many of the more extreme hate posts must be from people who don't actually live in the area, or physically walk by this. It's a larger build yes, but certainly not out of context with what else is happening around it when the average person sees it in person. The frontage on Esplanade absolutey fits with the area. And I'm confused about the alarm people express when discussing the Front and Sherbourn intersection, because it absolutely fits there too ... especially when you look at what is under construction or coming soon.
There are two very clear points of view on this project. There are those (most of whom agree that it will provide much needed housing) who think it is a total mess that could, and should, have been better designed so that it fitted better into the St Lawrence neighbourhood. Then there are those (many of whom appear to be purchasers/investors or developers) who think it's the best building ever. I fall into the group who think it could have been SO much better and the developers could still have made lots of money. It's not done yet but it is certainly not looking any less ghastly - particularly on the Front & Sherbourne sides and I ventured down Princess the other day and that too is 'somewhat' overwhelmed. As the north side towers rise, it is clear that the POPS courtyard will get VERY little sunlight - I am afraid it will not be the neighbourhood asset that was envisaged.So true!
Many are angry because they live in the area, and this building is introducing a level of density they don’t want or are blocking their previously less obstructed view.First, I'll admit I'm the epitome of a layman in terms of opinion on buildings.
That said, I feel like many of the more extreme hate posts must be from people who don't actually live in the area, or physically walk by this. It's a larger build yes, but certainly not out of context with what else is happening around it when the average person sees it in person. The frontage on Esplanade absolutey fits with the area. And I'm confused about the alarm people express when discussing the Front and Sherbourn intersection, because it absolutely fits there too ... especially when you look at what is under construction or coming soon.
Ah, thanks. I couldn't tell from the renders/current pics. That helps a bit...There is an east-west street roughly halfway between Front and Esplanade. There's no way through heading N-S.
density is lower at Mirvish village. also i think land is less exp there which is why they can have more parks.I think a big issue is how poorly it handles its mass, the attempts to break up the volumes are quite clumsy. Compare this to Mirvish Village which is similarly large development, with heights up to 26s, and is far more successful at breaking up the visual mass. You wouldn't need anywhere near 60s here, but in this case some taller but slimmer volumes with more breathing room would create a far less hulking structure.
I don't even think there's a mid-block connection in this thing, it's a very hostile structure.
If you are comparing T&S to the Well (or Sugar Wharf) , I fear that T&S will come off VERY VERY poorly. It is honestly hard to see how both could appear in the same sentence :->density is lower at Mirvish village. also i think land is less exp there which is why they can have more parks.
i think you should compare this to the well. both are downtown downtown locations. or even sugar wharf.
what is so special about sugar wharf.....two towers and a courtyard. It is higher but the integration with the city lack. There is nothing there. st lawerence at least has biagioIf you are comparing T&S to the Well (or Sugar Wharf) , I fear that T&S will come off VERY VERY poorly. It is honestly hard to see how both could appear in the same sentence :->