Toronto Sun Life Financial Tower & Harbour Plaza Residences | 236.51m | 67s | Menkes | Sweeny &Co

Yesterday morning:
IMG_0088.JPG
IMG_0089.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0088.JPG
    IMG_0088.JPG
    1.9 MB · Views: 2,018
  • IMG_0089.JPG
    IMG_0089.JPG
    1.9 MB · Views: 1,961
Jan 23 and more up on site
24490190342_b2a094e342_b.jpg

24516267001_3de89555db_b.jpg

24490195532_9532ab3c12_b.jpg

24302990540_e9a621f818_b.jpg

24302988970_bc59152b93_b.jpg

24516281841_6b0e033d31_b.jpg

24230765489_6bb129caea_b.jpg

24572383916_42aa6671ae_b.jpg
 
It's so difficult to tell how the balcony treatment will affect the overall look, but I am optimistic. For now, every little spot that isn't filled in with balcony yet, takes away from it.
 
The spots that aren't covered by a balcony don't take away from the overall look, they create the overall look. That look is a combination of objects and voids and the transitions between them. Without the voids and transitions, these towers would just be Casa IV and Casa V.

42
 
That's not what I was referring to, but perhaps I didn't explain it very clearly. I realize that there are parts without balconies altogether. I mean the unfinished sections of the actual balconies, where there will be balcony glass but at this point they just haven't installed it completely. I do actually prefer this overall look (once complete) to Casa simplicity.
 
The problem I'm already seeing is the grey bars that are between the balcony gaps. I'd like to imagine the balconies as a sort of high-tech layer wrapping itself around a square tower, but those grey bars are very distracting. There's almost always two between the wedges. At least it's consistent all the way up the building.
 
Photos taken from ICE by my friend:
12660347_10153941268916289_969662406_n.jpg
12656222_10153941269006289_1690405860_o.jpg
12669745_10153941269686289_1243201006_o.jpg
12633401_10153941268981289_1282424154_o.jpg
12631191_10153941268926289_1336664699_o.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 12660347_10153941268916289_969662406_n.jpg
    12660347_10153941268916289_969662406_n.jpg
    144.1 KB · Views: 2,382
  • 12656222_10153941269006289_1690405860_o.jpg
    12656222_10153941269006289_1690405860_o.jpg
    388.5 KB · Views: 2,394
  • 12669745_10153941269686289_1243201006_o.jpg
    12669745_10153941269686289_1243201006_o.jpg
    331.7 KB · Views: 2,387
  • 12633401_10153941268981289_1282424154_o.jpg
    12633401_10153941268981289_1282424154_o.jpg
    296.7 KB · Views: 2,365
  • 12631191_10153941268926289_1336664699_o.jpg
    12631191_10153941268926289_1336664699_o.jpg
    343.1 KB · Views: 2,399
This tower's western profile is really nice, but the rest of the building is pretty humdrum (excellent quality materials and execution, however).
 
Visible from the Financial District; plus a little photo dump around the site:
IMG_0445.jpg

IMG_0473.jpg

IMG_0485.JPG

IMG_0499.jpg

IMG_0500.JPG

IMG_0505.jpg

IMG_0515.JPG

IMG_0517.jpg

IMG_0521.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0515.JPG
    IMG_0515.JPG
    1.8 MB · Views: 1,841
  • IMG_0517.jpg
    IMG_0517.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 1,841
  • IMG_0500.JPG
    IMG_0500.JPG
    2.4 MB · Views: 1,935
  • IMG_0505.jpg
    IMG_0505.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 1,839
  • IMG_0499.jpg
    IMG_0499.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 1,885
  • IMG_0521.jpg
    IMG_0521.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 1,841
  • IMG_0445.jpg
    IMG_0445.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 1,880
  • IMG_0485.JPG
    IMG_0485.JPG
    2.2 MB · Views: 1,932
  • IMG_0473.jpg
    IMG_0473.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 1,833

Back
Top