Toronto Sugar Wharf Condominiums (Phase 1) | 231m | 70s | Menkes | a—A

[mburrrrr]

July 30

The SE and NW towers are starting to appear between the common courtyard with more podium floors still to come.

August 5

August 8

August 11

 

[mburrrrr]

Aug 30 Sept 4

 

[3Dementia]

Stupid question but the database design renders wander around so I confess I don't actually know what this tower looks like. Is it the second guy from the left? Thx.

UT

 

[cd concept]

Finally starting to see a clear visual of the bottom part of the two tower's angled floor plate starting to rise from the podium in the second last photo up above ! I hope the facade curtain wall of the towers turns out Allright !

 

[UtakataNoAnnex]

Also that's a much older rendering.

 

[interchange42]

Stupid question but the database design renders wander around so I confess I don't actually know what this tower looks like. Is it the second guy from the left? Thx.

UT

It's the two on the right… but yeah, it's an older rendering, and they have never released clear final renderings of these towers.

42

 

[Amare]

Maybe they haven't released the final renderings because they know we'll lambaste them for the non-sense they're most likely going to be putting up here.

 

[ProjectEnd]

More like: 'It's already sold. Why invest thousands in new renders when they're unnecessary?'

 

[Lachlan Holmes]

Were these never posted? Didn't see them in the database, sooo...

All of these images are from the Sugar Wharf website.

 

[ushahid]

Their latest Doc submitting to the city show a different design.

 

[3Dementia]

The 'bit old' 360 degree "views" on the project website made me smile... not only do they offer clear views to the northwest (where the 2 companion towers will be built), they neglected to mention a 312.50 m supertall plus 264 m and 217.00 m towers due west. Lake views and north views are truthful ;-)

 

[Khaloody]

Why does city have so many twin towers?

 

[ProjectEnd]

Easy density. Why not?

 

[condovo]

It's more economical to build two skyscrapers than one supertall.

 

[3Dementia]

It's more economical to build two skyscrapers than one supertall.

If the supertall you are alluding to is 448m (equivalent to SugarWharf D 230m + E 218m), I obviously agree.

For 300m supertall height fanboys (I'm guilty as charged), there have been some bitter pills to swallow like SugarWharf B proposed @ 299m and YSL @ 299m (a gaping partial excavation and uncertain future).

But Sam got his permit and skytower holes are being drilled, so yay.