News   Jul 22, 2024
 428     0 
News   Jul 22, 2024
 1.4K     0 
News   Jul 22, 2024
 583     0 

Toronto School Board Eyes Breakup

unimaginative2

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
10
Location
New York
Toronto school board eyes breakup

Public trustees look at four options to repair problems of Tory amalgamation
Dec 19, 2007 04:30 AM
The Star

Admitting it may be too big to serve students as well as it could, Canada's largest school board is looking at ways to become more manageable, including breaking itself into smaller boards.

The proposal – among several being studied by a special "governance" committee of Toronto public school board trustees – comes 10 years after then-premier Mike Harris created what was supposed to be a more streamlined, cost-efficient mega-board out of seven former local boards. But some now call that move a failed experiment.

Ontario Education Minister Kathleen Wynne, who fought amalgamation as a parent activist, says the board is simply too big and she's "thrilled" trustees are starting to think smaller. She said she doesn't favour any particular model.

The committee report outlines four options. Two would give the current mega-board more powerful regional offices or even community councils like the City of Toronto has. Another would split it into smaller boards with an "umbrella" overseeing body, as it was before amalgamation when six local boards reported to one Metro school board.

The final proposal would split the board into separate boards with no ties whatsoever.

With about 250,000 students – more than twice as many as experts say is best – the board has been slammed by outsiders and insiders alike for having too much bureaucracy and too little focus, being too inefficient and too impersonal.

Wynne made it clear that in her experience as a trustee and now education minister, "the board is big and it's complex.

"It's not just the size, it's the complexity of the city and all the demographics. Part of the problem is that it's hard for people to feel like they're part of something."

Today's last-minute meeting of the governance committee comes amid rumours the province is contemplating dividing up the board, although Wynne said yesterday she's "not interested in imposing anything unilaterally."

Others say a recent, damning report from a consultant, hired to help in the search for a new director of education, warns the current board is too unwieldy to attract applications for the top job.

Trustee Howard Goodman, chair of the governance committee, admits the board struggles with communication, with each of its 24 superintendents overseeing roughly 10,000 students.

Take Trustee Scott Harrison's booming Scarborough ward: It has roughly 20,000 students, the same size as the Kingston area school board. Harrison, a firefighter, wonders why Toronto couldn't break into four smaller autonomous boards with one head office overseeing human resources and technology – "the way the fire department operates."

While Goodman believes the board must improve communication, he worries that breaking the board apart would be "untenable."

"We're one city; Toronto would never tolerate having two school boards – say, Toronto East and Toronto West – because at least half the people will think they got the raw end of the deal," he said.

Moreover it would thrust students into "years of turmoil just like we had with amalgamation," Goodman warned. "We would be consumed with staff wondering who would go where, rather than serving kids. I don't think we should do that again."

However, Trustee Josh Matlow said there are much more pressing issues trustees should be dealing with: youth violence in schools, crumbling buildings and the board's estimated $51 million deficit for the 2008-9 school year.

But for former chair Sheila Ward, at the helm for the past four years, the board is bogged down and lacks focus.

"We're heaping work on staff. There's something like 50 to 60 reports that are waiting in the wings, and that's an absolutely ridiculous number. The staff time involved to do those is horrendous," she said.

"A responsible board doesn't act like that. A responsible board only asks for three or four a year, around goals you set during your term.

"We have been singularly unable to do that. Everyone is out there freelancing pet projects."

Annie Kidder, of the advocacy group People for Education, cautioned against simply turning back the clock to preamalgamation times.

"Going back is not the point; things weren't perfect then," she said, but there is "probably a much more sensible way of doing things than the way it looks right now," including increasing local input and decision-making.

Matlow said public consultation is crucial before proposing changes, and notes the board has put a lot of time and energy into creating a body that is " amalgamated in jurisdiction but also amalgamated in a sense of spirit.

"To hastily make dramatic change would be disastrous, and in the very same manner the (Mike) Harris government made those changes in the first place."

Board Chair John Campbell said today's meeting is part of an ongoing discussion since last fall, when provincially appointed supervisors Brian Cain and Joan Green recommended a review of the way the board is governed, citing concerns about "bureaucratic layers," "problems in co-ordination" and "loss of connection to communities."

"The sense of theatre around today's meeting has been a little bit overblown," Campbell said. "They're going to be talking in very general terms about how we're going to tackle some of the governance issues."

OTHER BOARDS

With 249,000 students, the Toronto District School Board is the largest in Canada. Here is how it stacks up against other Ontario boards:

Peel School Board: 137,000

York Region District School Board: 103,000

Toronto Catholic District School Board: 87,000

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board: 84,000

Thames Valley District School Board (London): 75,000
Source: Ontario education ministry
 
Although business is not a direct parallel to schools, of course, this is what IBM did several years back, when it found that big was not always viable.

After attempting to break itself up into smaller units to be more competitive as a company, the results were still mixed but they began to see what worked and what didn't. It became a valuable "lesson," shall we say, for the survival of the company.
 
Did I not say the TDSB needed reformation? Kudos for realizing resources were being stretched too thin (and by resources I mean catering to specific students needs).
 
I don't know if breaking up by geographical area is the most logical way to go as there would still be a lot of duplication. Perhaps the TDSB could split up by school type (separate elementary, middle, and high school boards), or by function (ESL, special needs, non special needs, facilities, finance).

I do think that there is a certain size at which any municipally run organization becomes too big to manage, which is why amalgamation isn't always as good as it's supposed to be. I think that the best possible system would be to operate schools, police, transit, utilities, garbage, etc. on the community level first (keeping in mind that community could mean 500,000 people), and each would report to one GTA wide umbrella organization.

There's no benefit to adhering to the old metro boundaries anymore. In many ways, Scarborough more closely resembles Markham than it does North York. North York more closely resembles Thornhill than it does Etobicoke. Downtown Toronto is really only similar to York and East York. Let similar parts of the city benefit from each other, regardless of the area code.
 
My prediction is that more smaller boards will simply mean more money and more deficits. There are much more pressing issues trustees should be dealing with like youth violence in schools, crumbling buildings and the board’s estimated $51 million deficit for the 2008-9 school year. Time trustees get to work on real solutions without this added distraction.
 
Although business is not a direct parallel to schools, of course, this is what IBM did several years back, when it found that big was not always viable.

Also don't forget how AT&T spawned the "Baby Bells" in the 1980s...
 
^Not by choice...

The problem with smaller geographic boards is that the Scarborough board would be absolutely swamped with kids requiring expensive ESL, the downtown Toronto board would be dealing with declining enrolment, and the North York and Etobicoke boards would be relatively comfortable. Doesn't sound like a recipe for equity, even with the same funding formula.
 
I spoke to someone earlier this evening that works for the TDSB in one of their admin offices. He can't see it happening, at most, a community council type set-up to provide more localized direction and review. After all, the TDSB administration and support only now has gotten used to the amalgamation from Bill 104.
 

Back
Top