No of course not, she just purchased a unit a year or two after approval like any other regular buyer. SALs claim here is "how did fletcher oppose other projects but then support this one! she is obviously in the back pockets of this developer!", while reality is clearly different. This project offers a lot to the neighborhood, rental housing, grocery store, new park, elimination of an ugly dealership right on Queen Street, etc. The dealerships are well integrated towards the rear of the property and are only a part of the uses proposed here. Everything else is well proposed in the development. But because she opposed a car dealership project elsewhere, which was a very poor proposal, no other uses, showroom right on Dundas, horrible site layout, etc., its somehow hypocritical because she apparently now has to oppose every car dealership.
