JasonParis
Moderator
Even getting the last gap of Line 5 addressed here would have made for a better announcement.
Ideally shouldn't be an either/or scenario. The Feds can pour money into the TOR/MON rail corridor while finding solutions for the Transit Hub. It would, however, require more political will and appetite to actually want to upgrade the transit infrastructure in this country than the Fed Liberals have shown thus far.While potentially useful, the importance of the transit hub - especially considering the current trends - seems overstated at this point. I'd rather put the money into proper HF/SR in the Toronto/Montreal corridor.
AoD
Ideally shouldn't be an either/or scenario. The Feds can pour money into the TOR/MON rail corridor while finding solutions for the Transit Hub. It would, however, require more political will and appetite to actually want to upgrade the transit infrastructure in this country than the Fed Liberals have shown thus far.
The usefulness of a Transit Hub shouldn't be directly tied to flying trends in regards to Pearson, unless we think the people working and travelling to the lands in/around the airport will suddenly fall off a cliff. The western GTA needs a multi-modal hub in the worst way. The kitchener line goes right by Pearson in almost a perfect curve. Requiring riders headed to the Pearson area from Kitchener/Guelph to go all the way to Union(or Weston GO) for a transfer back up the same line is maddening.
Access to terminal 3 is blocked/slow by City cab and limo guys lining up into waiting area near for limos.In the absence of decent higher order transit and regional/intercity rail service, a transit hub really doesn't make any sense yet. Terminal 1's bus platforms are nowhere near maxed out, and they deliver passengers right to the terminal door.
That would change if HxR ever gets done, especially if it is extended west of Toronto as an alternative to short distance flights which soak up too much of the airport's capacity.
What is important in the nearer term is for the Eglinton and Finch LRT's to be tied in in some sensible way that is future proofed for eventual expansion. A link to the Hurontario LRT would make a lot of sense.
It will come, just not yet.
https://jewelcars.co.uk/brighton-to-gatwick-taxi
- Paul
It's been a number of years since I worked down there but limos and requested taxis have a staging lot and are called up by a dispatcher/coordinator. There usually shouldn't be that many stacked at Arrivals. Poaching taxis are another matter, along with private cars who park or circuit and are too lazy/inconsiderate to use the cel-phone lot and a few unlicenced taxis/limos. Enforcement is generally a mess.Access to terminal 3 is blocked/slow by City cab and limo guys lining up into waiting area near for limos.
I thought when they built T1 that a station was roughed in for some kind of transit link already? Plus based on metrolinx, there are already funds committed by the feds and prov to extend eglington. Just need it finalized. Maybe I misread.I think a more modest Pearson transit plan could be done by...
- Extending Line 5 to Pearson (hopefully close to the current UPX/Link T1 station).
- Extending Line 6 to (Woodbine) Racetrack with a UPX stop for those needing to go to YYZ.
- Stopping all VIA/GO trains at Racetrack for a quick change to UPX. VIA would no longer service Malton, perhaps Weston too.
Twenty-five flights per week, and from Canada, not just Pearson.25 flights to India per day from Pearson. Interesting!
Air Canada expands service to India, to offer non-stop flights from Toronto to Mumbai
Air Canada says the flights between Toronto and Mumbai will run four times a week starting Oct. 27www.theglobeandmail.com
Oops! You are correct! Still an interesting increase and I imagine that there are a few other airlines flying there (Air India).Twenty-five flights per week, and from Canada, not just Pearson.