Toronto Pan Am Village in the West Don Lands | ?m | ?s | DundeeKilmer | KPMB

The old Railway Police building has now been "unveiled" and seems to have new windows etc. It looked pretty good from a distance.

More interestingly there was a large A-frame sign outside yesterday saying Canary District Presentation Centre so I assume that WT will FINALLY re-open Cherry Street soon.
 
One thing that seems off about the district is how every building has a massive mechanical penthouse clad in generic panels. These buildings are dominated by generic structures on the roofs. The seniors housing building on King looks terrible because of the mechanical box. Condo developers generally stopped putting up buildings with ugly mechanical penthouses in the past few years, but this district has them by the boatload.
 
The mechanical penthouse is a fundamental element of a modern building so the decision to highlight or hide it is the architects' alone. Your opinion on whether the chosen treatment is attractive or not is equally subjective.
 
One thing that seems off about the district is how every building has a massive mechanical penthouse clad in generic panels. These buildings are dominated by generic structures on the roofs. The seniors housing building on King looks terrible because of the mechanical box. Condo developers generally stopped putting up buildings with ugly mechanical penthouses in the past few years, but this district has them by the boatload.

You haven't seen the TCHC senior's building recently and that photo is months old. The mechanical penthouse looks just fine in real life as all of the spandrel panels were changed out to dark ones from the lighter grey ones.
 
The mechanical penthouse is a fundamental element of a modern building so the decision to highlight or hide it is the architects' alone. Your opinion on whether the chosen treatment is attractive or not is equally subjective.

A mechanical penthouse may be discretely incorporated into a facade or emphasized, but in good architecture, the mechanical penthouse is integrated into the architecture even if the architects want to highlight it. That means that the penthouse isn't just a generic volume seemingly tacked onto an otherwise interestingly detailed facade. My standard is objective. To top an otherwise fine building with some generic volume is bad architecture--whatever value you might have gained by designing a decent facade like that of the seniors' housing is undermined by a part of the building that doesn't look like it was designed at all--the top.
 
Some pictures from a May 24th visit to the Canary District presentation centre.
The free ice cream out front was a nice touch.

IMG_0313.jpg
IMG_0314.jpg
IMG_0315.jpg
IMG_0316.jpg
IMG_0317.jpg
IMG_0318.jpg
IMG_0319.jpg
IMG_0320.jpg
IMG_0322.jpg
IMG_0323.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0313.jpg
    IMG_0313.jpg
    97.1 KB · Views: 485
  • IMG_0314.jpg
    IMG_0314.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 496
  • IMG_0315.jpg
    IMG_0315.jpg
    87.9 KB · Views: 472
  • IMG_0316.jpg
    IMG_0316.jpg
    82 KB · Views: 504
  • IMG_0317.jpg
    IMG_0317.jpg
    94.4 KB · Views: 491
  • IMG_0318.jpg
    IMG_0318.jpg
    101.3 KB · Views: 470
  • IMG_0319.jpg
    IMG_0319.jpg
    97.7 KB · Views: 474
  • IMG_0320.jpg
    IMG_0320.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 493
  • IMG_0322.jpg
    IMG_0322.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 486
  • IMG_0323.jpg
    IMG_0323.jpg
    97.7 KB · Views: 480
27 floors above looking down
CIMG7860.jpg


CIMG7861.jpg



CIMG7863.jpg



CIMG7864.jpg



CIMG7865.jpg



CIMG7866.jpg



CIMG7867.jpg



CIMG7868.jpg



CIMG7869.jpg



CIMG7870.jpg



CIMG7871.jpg



CIMG7872.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CIMG7860.jpg
    CIMG7860.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 1,537
  • CIMG7861.jpg
    CIMG7861.jpg
    97.9 KB · Views: 1,528
  • CIMG7863.jpg
    CIMG7863.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 1,524
  • CIMG7864.jpg
    CIMG7864.jpg
    96.4 KB · Views: 1,531
  • CIMG7865.jpg
    CIMG7865.jpg
    98.3 KB · Views: 1,516
  • CIMG7866.jpg
    CIMG7866.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 1,524
  • CIMG7867.jpg
    CIMG7867.jpg
    97.3 KB · Views: 1,527
  • CIMG7868.jpg
    CIMG7868.jpg
    99.4 KB · Views: 1,529
  • CIMG7869.jpg
    CIMG7869.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 1,528
  • CIMG7870.jpg
    CIMG7870.jpg
    98.6 KB · Views: 1,524
  • CIMG7871.jpg
    CIMG7871.jpg
    96.9 KB · Views: 1,524
  • CIMG7872.jpg
    CIMG7872.jpg
    98.1 KB · Views: 1,520

Back
Top