Toronto Ontario Place | ?m | ?s | Infrastructure ON

Decision here: https://ontarioplaceprotectors.com/...ontario_place_protectors_v._hmk_judgment_.pdf

read through it, Its not the clearest of wins for the government.

the very least is that apperently that the applicant lacks standing.
Public trust argument is not a thing apperrently

While the judge said the entire act doesnt go against the constitution, she doesnt rule out that any action prohibited by the act couldnt actually be raised

Theoretically saying that someone could resubmit asking for remedies against the environmental act or heritage act
So they appealed this https://www.canadianarchitect.com/o...-launches-appeal-with-ontarios-highest-court/
Appeal document here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mSxECuhi2M2949Apz08KvAMMrYJvp5bM/view

Not a lawyer, but its going to be a few months before decision to take appeal up is even granted.
 
1727963614987.png
 
CBC with the summary

we already know about is the 700 million in costs from Therme, including 200 million for shoreline work and public space. I remember that number as 600 million awhile ago I think
Rent payments average about 20 million a year over 95 years. (numbers are off here its much higher)
Apperently Ontario is on the hook for 25 million for flood mitigation and shoreline repair. Im guessing that includes the pods?

Very suprising is the 15 year opt-out if notice is given 10 years in.
Parking lot is mentioned in the lease with 1800 spaces. though the government wants 2500

Overall, I like the transparency here.
 
Few more clarifying notes from the star, global, and trillium

- property taxes utilities and fees are owed to the city
- 1.1 bil in rent payments. So about 14 mil per year over 75 years
- 855 mil in "maintenance payments". This the part where Therme maintains the beaches and trails, I think. Its about 12 million per year
- combined to about 26 million per year
- rent is paid based on 3.5% of the land value, indexed to inflation starting in 2025 which amounts currently to 2 million. Little surprising theyre paying rent on the land when the spa isn't even built.
- Rent seems to ramp up after 2034 where its around $40 million a year
- total of 84 million per year between 2034 and 2044. Unclear if thats total or per year
- If Therme beats preformance expectations the government gets millions extra starting in 2034
 
and there we go. All the useless speculation about the province handing out massive amounts of subsidies to Therme can go away. The Government is *making money* on this, even including the parking structure.

What I would be interested to see is details on the parking structure financing. As it's a paid structure which will likely achieve fairly strong occupancy rates, I suspect it won't need much, if any subsidies and any that are required would come from the lease revenue.
 
and there we go. All the useless speculation about the province handing out massive amounts of subsidies to Therme can go away. The Government is *making money* on this, even including the parking structure.

What I would be interested to see is details on the parking structure financing. As it's a paid structure which will likely achieve fairly strong occupancy rates, I suspect it won't need much, if any subsidies and any that are required would come from the lease revenue.
You seem awfully confident in this when this government has demonstrated contempt of process in most other things when it comes to deals with the private sector. Not to mention, the summery list posted by generalcanada-san seems to have a lot of what ifs baked in it. But hey, don't let that rain on this parade, I guess...
 
You seem awfully confident in this when this government has demonstrated contempt of process in most other things when it comes to deals with the private sector. Not to mention, the summery list posted by generalcanada-san seems to have a lot of what ifs baked in it. But hey, don't let that rain on this parade, I guess...
Thats me reading news articles 10 minutes after it got released, instead of nitpicking, try giving it some time, maybe read the lease yourself and the answers will clear up.

We dont need to know exactly how much the rent will be in 2045, a guideline is completely fine
 
Thats me reading news articles 10 minutes after it got released, instead of nitpicking, try giving it some time, maybe read the lease yourself and the answers will clear up.

We dont need to know exactly how much the rent will be in 2045, a guideline is completely fine
I am being skeptical with an arrangement by a government that has given the public reasons to be skeptical of. So there is nothing wrong with that...

That being said though, I will always have open mind in case things do in fact go north with this...a broken watch tells the correct time twice a day, so we never know! But I am certainly not going to be holding my breath here, lol.
 
Last edited:
Few more clarifying notes from the star, global, and trillium

- property taxes utilities and fees are owed to the city
- 1.1 bil in rent payments. So about 14 mil per year over 75 years
- 855 mil in "maintenance payments". This the part where Therme maintains the beaches and trails, I think. Its about 12 million per year
- combined to about 26 million per year
- rent is paid based on 3.5% of the land value, indexed to inflation starting in 2025 which amounts currently to 2 million. Little surprising theyre paying rent on the land when the spa isn't even built.
- Rent seems to ramp up after 2034 where its around $40 million a year
- total of 84 million per year between 2034 and 2044. Unclear if thats total or per year
- If Therme beats preformance expectations the government gets millions extra starting in 2034
So all in all a lot better than what was there before where the province was subsidising Ontario Place even when they charged admittance.
 

Back
Top