81-717
Active Member
If it weren't for the line's name being printed, it'd be almost as if they did decide to renumber Sheppard to 3 (with the SRT gone), and the OL to 4, thereby grouping all 3 legacy subway lines together and the OL coming right after them.View attachment 519342
Interesting... why is the colour not blue??
As was recently mentioned in another thread, purple doesn't look as good combined with yellow & green, but having blue in between yellow/green & purple does bring a nice balance to it. Anyway I don't think many people would've mistaken the SRT to be a continuation of line 2 rather than a separate line, else they would've rebranded the SRT a different color a long time ago.Blue is not a great choice in proximity with yellow and green (Yonge and Bloor-Danforth lines). From an accessibility perspective, certain colour blind travellers may have difficulty distinguishing the blue from green.
Edit: on 2nd thought, I too think it's not worth renumbering Sheppard to 3 and OL to 4, because such a change would imply grouping the purple with the yellow & green (yellow, green, purple, blue, in order), and seeing 3 as purple might be a bit counterintuitive. Which means they'd also need to rebrand Sheppard as SRT blue and the OL as purple (which would primarily intersect yellow & green), at which point even I think, why bother, better to keep the current arrangement of lines 1, 2, 3, 4 being yellow, green, blue, purple, in order.
Last edited: