King of Kensington
Senior Member
Poll-by-poll results should be out soon. I suspect there will be a pretty contiguous "non-John Tory zone" running from roughly Kensington Market to Roncesvalles - i.e. where Olivia Chow won.
Poll-by-poll results should be out soon. I suspect there will be a pretty contiguous "non-John Tory zone" running from roughly Kensington Market to Roncesvalles - i.e. where Olivia Chow won.
Sure seems to be a lot of ONDP '18/John Tory '18 voters in the east end.
From my perspective moderate people are at least ok with John Tory, even if he is slightly right leaning by Toronto standards. The people who claim he is a competent version of Rob Ford I think don't want to admit that they are not in the mainstream of politics.I think people have a distorted perception of where John Tory voters sit on the political spectrum and how well progressive banner-holders resonate with various Old Toronto neighbourhoods.
John Tory is the Riverdale, Leslieville, Cabbagetown, Wychwood, Oakwood, The Beaches, North Toronto demographic. All of those places voted for him in two full election cycles now. Some of them can even be considered as John Tory strongholds.
And I am very tempted to add Liberty Village and City Place to that list of neighbourhoods.
From my perspective moderate people are at least ok with John Tory, even if he is slightly right leaning by Toronto standards. The people who claim he is a competent version of Rob Ford I think don't want to admit that they are not in the mainstream of politics.
From my perspective moderate people are at least ok with John Tory, even if he is slightly right leaning by Toronto standards. The people who claim he is a competent version of Rob Ford I think don't want to admit that they are not in the mainstream of politics.
A quarter of the vote for Keesmaat/Saron may be low, but it isn't inherently "not in the mainstream". If you were speaking of Saron *alone*, you might have a point; but...
And on that note, you might as well claim that *all* fashionable political opinionating is "not in the mainstream". Even that within so-called mainstream media.
I think Keesmaat might have suffered from a fundamental disconnect between the city-building aspirations she expressed and her unwillingness to talk candidly about how she proposed to pay for them. Her revenue platform was:
1. Raise around $80 million a year by hiking property taxes for around 4000 households by approximately 40%;
2. Promise to hold the Tory inflation ceiling for everybody else’s property taxes;
3. Mention other revenue tools in a non-threating and non-specific way; and
4. Assert that by some magic, we’d get more funding from higher-level governments if she were mayor.
It wasn’t a particularly honest or coherent package. In fact, dare I use the analogy, it looked like it had been sketched on the back of a cocktail napkin.