Perhaps dead-beat instead of dead-beats. The owner of 205 Yonge seems to care more about his building compared to the owners of 197 Yonge.
That Irish business man bought it on a whim while in town for other business. And why not...he paid dick-all for an amazing building. Except he had/has no idea what to do with it. Meanwhile, it and its neighbour sit there making a stretch of Yonge look very, very bad.
Purchasing these white elephants is the last thing the city needs to do.
Well...I think
selling them was the last thing the city should have done. That's right...back in the 80's, the city owned 197, 197R, 201 Yonge, the old Colonial Tavern (now empty lot) & 170 Victoria St (sold to Parasuco Jeans Inc in 1999) as well as 205 Yonge (sold in the early 2000's). The great ironic kick in the ass is that 205 Yonge was the home of the city's Historical Board (which the city extensively renovated in 1992).
The city purchased these properties back in the 80's as part of fabulous grand scheme of turning the entire area bounded by Yonge, Queen, Shuter & Victoria into the "Theatre Block". This was at the same time the Ont gov't bought and restored the Elgin/Winter Garden. This area also included the venerable Massey Hall. The Mirvishes were to be involved, but bailed and built their new theatre on King (Princess of Whales). The 90's economic doldrums pretty much killed the idea, and the properties were sold off as "surplus" land, but hoping it would just be part of the Yonge revitalization initiative.
yea...some revitalization...while the rest of lower Yonge has seen some progress in this, these former city properties are the ones sitting there rotting. What a joke.
Some kind of nudging needs to be done (unofficially) to encourage the present owners of these two properties to repurpose them.
The problem with the city, is that it does not have the foresight to include clauses in these sales agreements putting a time limit on doing something with the property. They made the same retarded mistake with Penequity at Dundas Square. They expropriated the land...gave it to Penequity for practically nothing, to watch them sit there and do eff-all for 500 years...and then construct some peice-0-shite. And all because the city didn't have the brains to put some teeth in the deal (in fact, they shouldn't have sold it to such a non-starter dumb ass company such as Penequity in the first place).
There's a new sheriff in town as of the last election, who would have little patience with this type of spending, much as some of us want to see a higher priority placed on heritage preservation.
Well, the new sheriff and his deputy better get their fat heads out of their fat asses ASAP. It's called
investing in the city. It pays off in dividends. Someone might want to educate these old boys on some basic city building.
I think the Theatre Block concept was a great one, and just because the 90's put a hold on it, I actually think it's still a doable idea (or something similar along those lines). Why let opportunities like that slide? As somebody said, this is a dead zone, and the city just can't afford to have such a prominent spot be a wart on the city....it's bad for the city. Letting the buildings rot until the dead-beat owners manage to find some steak house operation try and make a go of it for a few years before they go bust and it sits empty again is simply not a good plan. This is a clear case where the city has to take some initiative.
But you're right, the current jokers running city hall are more interested in hollow, symbolic gestures of getting rid of the sandwich cart at city hall and chocolates from Holt Renfrew than doing any meaningful city building.