I think too many restrictions, will put a damper on a great market,... where projects are driven to compete with one another,...... to catch the buyers eye, is too make money....height brings cache', it speaks to ego....
'I live in the landmark known as..________.
Tall is a bold but simple way to catch an eye,...even architects....Cesar Pelli designed the Petronas towers cause the height intrigued him.
Sometimes regulation can, and should be left out of the equation, and the market will dictate more often than not whats gets built.
All towers should be revued,... but blanket policy can stagnate proposals, and designs before they reach the market, a case by case method would seem to be a better mode of regulation.
Also with density and property values so interwoven, and the risk taken on by developers, more should be done to encourage the worlds best, to come here, and when they do, a stupid blanket 25 story law, seems ridiculous and like lazy policing . Height is part of the value and seems wrong to blanket a good design.
A ridiculous building will not sell, and government builds some awful buiildings cause theirs no risk for such a project. Let demand dictate, not some beauraucrat from anywhere else but the streets they make rules for. If you want to live and walk in the city, that fact is not understood by a mall shopping, cul de sac living, off ramp runway living suit, working for a paycheck. Density, is always the best "long term " choice. The sustainability of the 20 th century metropolis, lies entirely on their ability to escape sprawl, and embrace community, block to block. not township to township.