Dr. Snoot
Active Member
And those horribly-dated, sad planters have got to go.
They’re big planters. They contain plants. They look fine. Not everything old is bad.
And those horribly-dated, sad planters have got to go.
They’re big planters. They contain plants. They look fine. Not everything old is bad.
They also serve to block cars, if they go we will simply see Jersey barriers - look at Union Station!And those horribly-dated, sad planters have got to go.
^^^ The lazy, poorly-planted, randomly-placed, (likely) holdover planters really undermine the brand new landscape. They're like the awful, back-alley trash bins that creep back into our best-intentioned, re-designed parks. It's as if one city team is trying to step things up and do things better while another's trying to pull everything back down again and stick to the way things have always been done. The planters have to go.
They will survive if the right trees were chosen and they're properly cared for. Works great elsewhere, including condo roofs. The question is more about one thing: will the City of Toronto actually maintain them?
Removable bollards would work fine.They also serve to block cars, if they go we will simply see Jersey barriers - look at Union Station!
Yes, of course they would look better but the City seems unable to think of anything other than Jersey barriers! (Or maybe planters).Removable bollards would work fine.
Yes, of course they would look better but the City seems unable to think of anything other than Jersey barriers! (Or maybe planters).
Removable bollards would work fine.