toraerach
Active Member
It's kind of funny (in a really sad and pathetic way) that the people who whine over the loss of a few lanes will be the same ones bitching when gas is too high for them to drive and no one had the foresight to plan better.
I don't know how much I buy into the whole "people in Mississauga will never embrace public transit" argument. That's assuming that the people of Mississauga are a static entity. Thousands of new people move to the city every year and thousands more young people are getting to the age where they can go off on their own. These are the groups transit agencies should be targetting. Someone who moved to the city in the 1970s, for example, will find it hard to ever see him/herself in it without their car. This is their only experiece of the city and their only experience of how to live in it. Some might be pursuaded to hang up the keys, but that group will probably never see transit as their first priority.
Newer groups, younger groups, and groups that are not able to participate in the car culture form the primary ridership of suburban transit systems (at least in my experience). Improvements must be made so that they stick with it. This can be hard when the city still believes that not having a car is a disadvantage - that using transit is a last resort, not a first choice. Through investing in the LRT the city can give further legitimacy to transit. Make the trip more convenient so that when weighing the pros and cons people choose to stick with transit.
You can't just go after the drivers and tell them that they should leave the car at home - you have to prove to them that it is possible. For them it is a sacrifice that you have to prove is worth it. The city needs to take leadership on this. If they really want cars off the roads, they have to stop caving in all of the time.
Of course, this is Canada - not even that - this is the GTA where we make lacklustre promises, wait for someone to complain even a bit, and use that as justification for the cancellation of a project that would've made services barely adequate to begin with.
At least Hamilton looks like they're genuinely interested in LRT. Maybe once their system's up it will spur on more development. Of course, there will be ten years of studies on the affects of the system on traffic before anything else gets done.
I'm sorry if I sound a little angry. It takes me two and a half hours to walk to work because there's no transit and the quickest routes have no sidewalks. The best part is that I work in a gas station in the middle of a parking lot right off of a major highway and I don't even have/plan on getting my licence .
I don't know how much I buy into the whole "people in Mississauga will never embrace public transit" argument. That's assuming that the people of Mississauga are a static entity. Thousands of new people move to the city every year and thousands more young people are getting to the age where they can go off on their own. These are the groups transit agencies should be targetting. Someone who moved to the city in the 1970s, for example, will find it hard to ever see him/herself in it without their car. This is their only experiece of the city and their only experience of how to live in it. Some might be pursuaded to hang up the keys, but that group will probably never see transit as their first priority.
Newer groups, younger groups, and groups that are not able to participate in the car culture form the primary ridership of suburban transit systems (at least in my experience). Improvements must be made so that they stick with it. This can be hard when the city still believes that not having a car is a disadvantage - that using transit is a last resort, not a first choice. Through investing in the LRT the city can give further legitimacy to transit. Make the trip more convenient so that when weighing the pros and cons people choose to stick with transit.
You can't just go after the drivers and tell them that they should leave the car at home - you have to prove to them that it is possible. For them it is a sacrifice that you have to prove is worth it. The city needs to take leadership on this. If they really want cars off the roads, they have to stop caving in all of the time.
Of course, this is Canada - not even that - this is the GTA where we make lacklustre promises, wait for someone to complain even a bit, and use that as justification for the cancellation of a project that would've made services barely adequate to begin with.
At least Hamilton looks like they're genuinely interested in LRT. Maybe once their system's up it will spur on more development. Of course, there will be ten years of studies on the affects of the system on traffic before anything else gets done.
I'm sorry if I sound a little angry. It takes me two and a half hours to walk to work because there's no transit and the quickest routes have no sidewalks. The best part is that I work in a gas station in the middle of a parking lot right off of a major highway and I don't even have/plan on getting my licence .