AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
We'll have to see just how "national" it is when (and if) the Feds does the funding announcement. Certainly, we had plenty to show for our urban "national" park.
AoD
AoD
They tore the tower down in 1986...
Is the ex-marine museum the old stone building on the Exhibition grounds? Is it empty now? Shame if it is.
I understand that historians get all funny about moving buildings and all but it does seem unfortunate that this building is lost on its own, ignored by crowds during the Exhibition and completely abandoned the rest of the year. Given that the location of the lake's shore has changed drastically over the years wouldn't it make sense to move a building like this to give it some sort of heritage (if not 'historic') context. Maybe this building with the right sort of addition could be used as a Fort York visitors centre? Maybe it would be at home at Harbourfront or somewhere on the Lakeshore as a visitors centre?
Too bad Fort York was not built like Kingston's Fort Henry. Something like this would have easily made a great public space.
Well, Fort York is certainly treated like an isolated afterthought despite being right downtown, sandwiched between a wide rail corridor and an ugly elevated expressway, and cut off from the lake by what was until recently an industrial area. Amazes me that the city didn't wind up bulldozing it in order to keep the Gardiner straight.
Well, not so much bulldozing it, as removing it and resurrecting it closer to the waterfront...
Too bad Abu Simbel wasn't moved here, into the banks of the Humber, for example. Egypt already has lots of that stuff. We coulda been like that town in Arizona that bought the London Bridge.
42