Toronto Fleur Condos | 85.34m | 29s | Menkes | a—A

[ProjectEnd]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1239915753417121798

 

[innsertnamehere]

Crane has suddenly disappeared.

View attachment 236465

What? This is nowhere close to topping out.

 

[DarkSideDenizen]

 

[Benito]

Today.

 

[ADRM]

This is looking absolutely excellent. I particularly like how it meets the street; it’s got great presence and manages to simultaneously integrate nicely into the existing context whilst also being a super welcome breath of fresh air.

 

[AlbertC]

Agreed about the stellar street presence. The northern most section transitions well towards the neighbouring Edwardian block. While the corner piece looks like a clean modern adaption of the Thomson Building (at Queen & Bay) motif.

 

[Yegger]

Gorgeous podium treatment and fantastic overall design and execution. Menkes should take this and plunk copies at Sugar Wharf.

 

[lightarchitect]

The beauty of not having any balconies.

 

[skycandy]

Black beauty...peeking out at RP.

 

[khris]

How are they pouring floors with no crane?

 

[innsertnamehere]

thinking about it, my bet is that it's because of the helicopter flight path, which the crane can't exceed. It is a bit odd however considering 88 Queen kept its crane right until topping out.

 

[Yegger]

wow, even the back side of the podium is clad nicely. They aren't messing around here!

 

[WeirdFishes]

How are they pouring floors with no crane?

Very good question! I've been wondering that too. But is it worth installing another crane when they only have a few floors to go?

 

[Edward Skira]

Concrete doesn't need a crane. They can pump it up.

 

[jje1000]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1239915753417121798

I am definitely liking that podium datum line that visually connects the old rowhouses together.

I wonder- is the angled setback an intentional concession to reduce late early-day shading on St. Michael's Cathedral?

Correction: Early-day shading.