grey
Senior Member
I'm musing on a scenario where the City can intervene in the rental market, specifically in areas like this.
I know that some forms of rent controls in the past generally backfired in terms of quantity of housing, keeping prices low, and various other inefficiencies. But what about something like San Fransisco's Rent Stabilization Ordinance which pertains to buildings constructed earlier than the 1970s (and exempts newer buildings)? What if the City used that to target streets full of potential heritage stock? The ultimate goal being to increase building investment by creating an incentive for retail tenants to maintain and renovate their spaces from their own pockets without losing the added value to their landlords, and maybe controling the incentive for landlords to rennovate and improve their buildings via vacancy decontrol.
Please forgive my ignorance about the City's bureaucratic nuances and the use of rent controls throughout history.
I know that some forms of rent controls in the past generally backfired in terms of quantity of housing, keeping prices low, and various other inefficiencies. But what about something like San Fransisco's Rent Stabilization Ordinance which pertains to buildings constructed earlier than the 1970s (and exempts newer buildings)? What if the City used that to target streets full of potential heritage stock? The ultimate goal being to increase building investment by creating an incentive for retail tenants to maintain and renovate their spaces from their own pockets without losing the added value to their landlords, and maybe controling the incentive for landlords to rennovate and improve their buildings via vacancy decontrol.
Please forgive my ignorance about the City's bureaucratic nuances and the use of rent controls throughout history.
Last edited: