News   Dec 09, 2025
 317     0 
News   Dec 09, 2025
 830     5 
News   Dec 09, 2025
 455     0 

Toronto Eglinton Line 5 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis

Just got off the 34 from Kennedy to dvp.
I passed 3 trains who were operating at full speeds along the route. I have to say the biggest flaw has got to be the signaling as well as the stations being on the wrong side of the intersection in relation to the flawed signaling. As disastrous as the lack of light priority and the stupid premature red for trains aside, the fact that the train has to stop again shortly after crossing the intersection really is a double whammy to the travel time. The city seriously needs to pull their heads out of their asses to see just how badly they're running this. They need to stop thinking streetcar. That is unless its intentional sabotage to favour future lines to be subway.....
 
I passed 3 trains who were operating at full speeds along the route. I have to say the biggest flaw has got to be the signaling as well as the stations being on the wrong side of the intersection in relation to the flawed signaling. As disastrous as the lack of light priority and the stupid premature red for trains aside, the fact that the train has to stop again shortly after crossing the intersection really is a double whammy to the travel time. The city seriously needs to pull their heads out of their asses to see just how badly they're running this. They need to stop thinking streetcar. That is unless its intentional sabotage to favour future lines to be subway.....
Are not far side stops safer for the passengers? You're not then competing with as many right-turning vehicles to cross to your transit stop.

Need I remind the "should be subways instead of streetcars" folks that the Sheppard Line has been on the brink of permanent closure TWICE because it's never come close to projected ridership? Aside from the initial capital cost, it's super expensive to run subways. Above ground lines are relatively easy to remove if it's the case that it's no longer needed. Subway tunnels, not so much. In fact, you still have to spend money maintaining the tunnel or you will sooner or later end up dealing with a safety hazard under existing home/infrastructure.
 
Regarding the dicussion of transit signals,

The only approved transit signal by the MTO is the single vertical bar atop a regular signal head:
1748874125820.png


IIRC Ion LRT got special permission to use the more traditional european signal head:
1748873982743.png


MTO updated Book 12 in 2024 and didn't include this style which is a massive disappointment.
 

Attachments

  • 1748873911591.png
    1748873911591.png
    177.5 KB · Views: 40
Are not far side stops safer for the passengers? You're not then competing with as many right-turning vehicles to cross to your transit stop.

Need I remind the "should be subways instead of streetcars" folks that the Sheppard Line has been on the brink of permanent closure TWICE because it's never come close to projected ridership? Aside from the initial capital cost, it's super expensive to run subways. Above ground lines are relatively easy to remove if it's the case that it's no longer needed. Subway tunnels, not so much. In fact, you still have to spend money maintaining the tunnel or you will sooner or later end up dealing with a safety hazard under existing home/infrastructure.
well they need to program the traffic signals to suit then! right now the control logic is if its on the nearside stop like a streetcar.
 
[...] KWs LRT (which Metrolinx didn't touch) doesn't have the same mess of signals. The signals they use where it is street running is a white bar that changes from being vertical (LRVs can move through the intersection) or horizontal (trains must stop and wait). The white bar will start flashing before it switches to warn the operators that a switch is happening.
This is the setup for KWs signal, the train signal is to the left. If you mix the train signal up with a traffic signal you really shouldn't be driving.
View attachment 655677
Regarding the dicussion of transit signals,

The only approved transit signal by the MTO is the single vertical bar atop a regular signal head:
View attachment 655688

IIRC Ion LRT got special permission to use the more traditional european signal head:
View attachment 655687

MTO updated Book 12 in 2024 and didn't include this style which is a massive disappointment.

This is exactly what I was referring to in my post - the K-W signals do indeed give the operator advance notice. How long does the horizontal bar flash for before changing??

Leave it to the most German city in Ontario to get transit signals right!
 
Far side stops have two advantages: the first is that they are easier to build where there there are left turn lanes on the near sides. The problem is that there are too many left turns permitted on our median ROW transit routes like Viva, St. Clair, Spadina, or Eglinton. At least Montreal banned most left turns along the Pie-IX busway.

The second is that, if you have signal priority – even just a green signal hold for an approaching transit vehicle – the tram only has to stop once. That’s of course if the signal priority is set up for it.
 
Far side stops have two advantages: the first is that they are easier to build where there there are left turn lanes on the near sides. The problem is that there are too many left turns permitted on our median ROW transit routes like Viva, St. Clair, Spadina, or Eglinton. At least Montreal banned most left turns along the Pie-IX busway.

The second is that, if you have signal priority – even just a green signal hold for an approaching transit vehicle – the tram only has to stop once. That’s of course if the signal priority is set up for it.
well thats their biggest problem... not only do they not have priority, the signal actually turns red 15s before the car signal does. Toronto simply just doesnt understand, nor care that they wasted billions on a streetcar
 
For the information counter, wouldn't it be better if they had the counter outside the fare gate in the non-fare area?
simple fix...all they have to do is shift the gates 5 ft forward.... though getting them to do it will be like designing a 50s tower...
 
I still can't believe that a subway line doesn't have right-of-way. If it doesn't have right-of-way it should be part of the Toronto streetcar system (500-599) instead of the subway.
 
At least Montreal banned most left turns along the Pie-IX busway.
Montreal has the advantage of a better grid system in a more urban area, with the next parallel arteries being only one-km away, while it's two kilometres to Lawrence and St. Clair - neither of which are continuous east of Bayview or Mount Pleasant.
 
Are not far side stops safer for the passengers? You're not then competing with as many right-turning vehicles to cross to your transit stop.
I'm not sure how they are safer. They have to deal with exactly the same number of right-turning vehicles as if they were nearside stops.

The one advantage to farside stops is that, when the signal priority is active, it can hold a green for an approaching train and allow it to clear the intersection before it turns red. It's much harder to do that when the train has to serve a stop first. (There are also land-use advantages with roadway shape and size, but those don't benefit the transit systems.)

All else being equal however, they are no better or no worse than nearside stops.

well they need to program the traffic signals to suit then! right now the control logic is if its on the nearside stop like a streetcar.
It's not.

They just haven't turned on the feeds to hold signals for the trains yet.

Dan
 
This is exactly what I was referring to in my post - the K-W signals do indeed give the operator advance notice. How long does the horizontal bar flash for before changing??

Leave it to the most German city in Ontario to get transit signals right!

I don't remember the exact time off the top of my head but it flashes for a couple of seconds at least, the same thing happens with the vertical bar when it is going to turn back to horizontal. It gives enough warning that the operator has adequate time to either stop or proceed.
 

Back
Top