Coolstar
Senior Member
No offense but I really hate the way the surface stops are designed! Half of it isn't fully covered. At least ION has fully cover sections. The surface stops look more like 510 Spadina streetcar stops
Isn't that because ION will be operating with single cars on opening with the platforms (but not shelters yet) built for 2 cars? On the other hand, Eglinton will be operating with 2 cars with platforms and shelters built for 3? So they basically cheapened out on the shelters to cover specific sections of the 3-car platform while Waterloo built a complete shelter for 1 car. I'm not saying that this is acceptable, just that this may be the reasoning for it.No offense but I really hate the way the surface stops are designed! Half of it isn't fully covered. At least ION has fully cover sections. The surface stops look more like 510 Spadina streetcar stops
The shelters look a lot smaller than the length of the vehicles.Isn't that because ION will be operating with single cars on opening with the platforms (but not shelters yet) built for 2 cars? On the other hand, Eglinton will be operating with 2 cars with platforms and shelters built for 3? So they basically cheapened out on the shelters to cover specific sections of the 3-car platform while Waterloo built a complete shelter for 1 car. I'm not saying that this is acceptable, just that this may be the reasoning for it.
I know. I estimate that the shelters will only cover 2 doors of each car, which mean 3/5 of the platform won’t be covered. To be honest, I doubt the shelters were designed with the trains in mind to line up with the doors.The shelters look a lot smaller than the length of the vehicles.
It would been nice if they have a heated shelter at every station. Being half cover has it's advantage. They are designed to make the stations more open without blocking the line of sight. It allows drivers to see oncoming vehicles easier and avoid any hidden spots on the platform where crimes easily occur.No offense but I really hate the way the surface stops are designed! Half of it isn't fully covered. At least ION has fully cover sections. The surface stops look more like 510 Spadina streetcar stops
No offense but I really hate the way the surface stops are designed! Half of it isn't fully covered. At least ION has fully cover sections. The surface stops look more like 510 Spadina streetcar stops
^More roof area may matter in bad weather. If everyone huddles under the wee bits of shelter, when a trainset arrives, there will be crowding at a few doors and no one boarding at others, The result will be longer dwell time.
The roof should be long enough that people aren’t bunched on the platform.
- Paul
I'm not sure we should want Montreal metro-like speeds for opening the doors, but at the same time, I cannot disagree with you. What is interesting though is that the TRs used to be a lot worse. I'm not sure why bombardier's door times seem to be slightly longer than other city's (with the exception of New York, where the guard has to close the doors in parts on most lines).Honestly the largest contributor to dwell times I have seen on the new streetcars is by far how ungodly slow the doors are to open and close. Its unreal. What an engineering fail.
This seems to be a systemwide issue. The subway doors take forever to open/close on the new TR rockets, the new fare gates take forever to open and close. Something about modern systems/actuators that are making doors a nightmare in modern systems.
The subway doors take forever to open/close on the new TR rockets,
This is the one thing I miss about the H series cars. The H2 and the H4 cars would leave a bruise if not break a rib should you be caught in the closing doors. They were a virtual guillotine.
Those doors were deadly and I doubt the TTC wants that to happen again.




