Toronto East United Condos | 82.6m | 24s | SigNature | Giannone Petricone

From just now.

IMG_4870.JPG
IMG_4871.JPG
IMG_4867.JPG
IMG_4869.JPG
IMG_4868.JPG
IMG_4866.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4870.JPG
    IMG_4870.JPG
    280.6 KB · Views: 713
  • IMG_4871.JPG
    IMG_4871.JPG
    317.1 KB · Views: 699
  • IMG_4868.JPG
    IMG_4868.JPG
    586.9 KB · Views: 727
  • IMG_4869.JPG
    IMG_4869.JPG
    327.2 KB · Views: 719
  • IMG_4867.JPG
    IMG_4867.JPG
    606 KB · Views: 719
  • IMG_4866.JPG
    IMG_4866.JPG
    602.1 KB · Views: 716
Saturday.

IMG_5488.JPG
IMG_5489.JPG
IMG_5490.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5488.JPG
    IMG_5488.JPG
    400 KB · Views: 648
  • IMG_5489.JPG
    IMG_5489.JPG
    373.7 KB · Views: 645
  • IMG_5490.JPG
    IMG_5490.JPG
    721.5 KB · Views: 643
The east end is about to spout another tower. A nothing location that will be greatly improved by this and others in the pipeline.

IMG_6104.JPG
IMG_6103.JPG
IMG_6106.JPG
IMG_6105.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6104.JPG
    IMG_6104.JPG
    241.8 KB · Views: 647
  • IMG_6103.JPG
    IMG_6103.JPG
    300.4 KB · Views: 622
  • IMG_6106.JPG
    IMG_6106.JPG
    420.4 KB · Views: 673
  • IMG_6105.JPG
    IMG_6105.JPG
    505.7 KB · Views: 651
Yesterday evening:

DSC04046.jpg
DSC04047.jpg


At ground level on Parliament:

DSC04048.jpg
DSC04049.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • DSC04046.jpg
    DSC04046.jpg
    274.8 KB · Views: 634
  • DSC04047.jpg
    DSC04047.jpg
    310.1 KB · Views: 632
  • DSC04048.jpg
    DSC04048.jpg
    330.6 KB · Views: 609
  • DSC04049.jpg
    DSC04049.jpg
    367 KB · Views: 602
Up they go.

IMG_6869.JPG
IMG_6864.JPG
IMG_6862.JPG
IMG_6861.JPG
IMG_6859.JPG
IMG_6868.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6869.JPG
    IMG_6869.JPG
    246.8 KB · Views: 611
  • IMG_6864.JPG
    IMG_6864.JPG
    201.6 KB · Views: 644
  • IMG_6862.JPG
    IMG_6862.JPG
    198.4 KB · Views: 615
  • IMG_6861.JPG
    IMG_6861.JPG
    258.3 KB · Views: 613
  • IMG_6868.JPG
    IMG_6868.JPG
    237.2 KB · Views: 597
  • IMG_6859.JPG
    IMG_6859.JPG
    255.4 KB · Views: 602
IMG_6988.JPG
IMG_6987.JPG
IMG_6985.JPG
IMG_6986.JPG
IMG_6989.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6988.JPG
    IMG_6988.JPG
    218.9 KB · Views: 623
  • IMG_6987.JPG
    IMG_6987.JPG
    204.6 KB · Views: 648
  • IMG_6985.JPG
    IMG_6985.JPG
    201.3 KB · Views: 603
  • IMG_6986.JPG
    IMG_6986.JPG
    332.4 KB · Views: 651
  • IMG_6989.JPG
    IMG_6989.JPG
    236.7 KB · Views: 630
Starting to rise.

D1948EB9-2007-4774-A21B-AC48C75B7DDA.jpeg


21850357-67DE-44A1-908F-742D5118D399.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • D1948EB9-2007-4774-A21B-AC48C75B7DDA.jpeg
    D1948EB9-2007-4774-A21B-AC48C75B7DDA.jpeg
    554.4 KB · Views: 632
  • 21850357-67DE-44A1-908F-742D5118D399.jpeg
    21850357-67DE-44A1-908F-742D5118D399.jpeg
    543.4 KB · Views: 645
Hmm. Not even posted yet. Interesting…

42
 
Hmm. Not even posted yet. Interesting…

42
Yes, 'interesting" case. They first applied for more than 21 floors but were 'talked down' by the City. Then, after 21 were approved and after they had dug the foundations, they tried to get an increase in floors at the Committee of Adjustment where they were told the request was NOT minor so they went to OMB. This is exactly the kind of decision that the OMB should not be able to make (and which the recent reforms will stop). One can argue that the site COULD 'support' 24 floors (or more) but the City's thoughtful decision was it should be capped at 21. It was not wrong to impose this height limit nor against any zoning or planning principles; the OMB should have respected the City decision.
 
Database file and thread title updated with the new number of storeys and the height in various recognized units of length.

42
 

Back
Top