daniel_kryz
Active Member
Only took them two years to put some benches in.
How do you think the artist intended the glass panels to be supported? (A sky crane?) While I agree that the supporting structure is quite obvious, it is the mark of a good artist to conceptualise his/her works and then ensure that they can actually be realised in the real world while retaining his/her 'vision'. Did that occur here? I will decide when I see it on site.Looks like the realities of construction were not considered in the original design of the piece. I'm sure all those supporting rods/struts were not part of the artist's vision and certainly take away from the overall design in my opinion.
Yeah, I find a lot of renderings always seem to treat glass as some magical material that is self-supporting and can just magically float in the air. This still looks good IMO, and most people who see it will have never seen the rendering to compare it to.
Yes, even a parkette has some greenery. It's a fairly nice piece of art commemorating a person who ought to be commemorated and it is sitting in the middle of the sidewalk at Adelaide and Widmer. (Coincidentally (?) Dr Thomas Widmer was a contemporary of Grasett.).I was going to say call it a parkette and call it a day, but nah, that's a stretch.