Clarington Darlington Small Modular Reactor | ?m | 1s | OPG | SNC-Lavalin

AlvinofDiaspar said:
Building a single SMR was a bit of a headscratcher to me from the start - but even now it feels a little odd considering even 4 SMRs only equate to an output of what, a single regular CANDU on a site with multiple units.

AoD
Click to expand...

A single SMR was the minimum. Their license application mentioned the option for 3 additional SMRs. Of course, at that time I think the expectation was that the first would go live for a couple years before starting the others. For a 2030 completion they'll be building all 4 at the same time as the one under construction completes in 2028.

Darlington New Nuclear Project

Learn about the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station, its safety oversight, licensing, and environmental protection by the CNSC.
nuclearsafety.gc.ca nuclearsafety.gc.ca
 
AlvinofDiaspar said:
Building a single SMR was a bit of a headscratcher to me from the start - but even now it feels a little odd considering even 4 SMRs only equate to an output of what, a single regular CANDU on a site with multiple units.

AoD
Click to expand...
It may partially be a proof of concept build. Even if the technology is established elsewhere (and I don't know if it is), it allows our governments, regulators, OPG, bank, etc. to get a feel for it.

I couldn't open the link, but I think it is a good idea, if for no other reason than some people casually read about "small" and "modular" and have gone off thinking that this is something like a 'reactor-in-a-seacan' that we can drop off in Rankin Inlet or Fort Severn and end their dependency on diesel.
 
I'm generally supportive of nuclear, particularly SMR, provided we can deliver on promises of more straightforward and cost effective deployment. It it pretty questionable that the cost of power from these SMRs is estimated around 11-14 cents per kwh, which is more expensive than wind+battery.

I think the RethinkX whitepaper on wind+solar+battery being cost effective and potentially an avenue to significant electrification of industrial processes through the use of currently curtailed excess renewables. I suspect baseload nuclear would be a good complement to that portfolio of technologies (as well as additional energy storage like pumped hydro) even if nuclear is more expensive, as it may reduce further the need for grid battery storage.
 
TORONTO – Today, Stephen Lecce, Ontario’s Minister of Energy and Mines, issued the following statement in response to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s decision to issue a power reactor construction licence for Unit One of the Darlington New Nuclear Project.

“This approval is a historic milestone for Ontario and Canada. The Darlington Small Modular Reactor (SMR) will be the first of its kind in the G7, helping to power our growing province with reliable, affordable, and emissions-free energy.

The Darlington New Nuclear Project could create up to 17,000 Canadian jobs during construction, contribute over $15 billion to Canada’s GDP, and drive $500 million annually into our supply chain because our government has insisted and successfully negotiated that local Ontario and Canadian businesses must be overwhelmingly used to build SMRs for the world.

Ontario is realizing its potential as a stable democratic energy superpower, and I look forward to sharing next steps for this exciting project in the coming weeks.”
 
Edward Skira said:
TORONTO – Today, Stephen Lecce, Ontario’s Minister of Energy and Mines, issued the following statement in response to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s decision to issue a power reactor construction licence for Unit One of the Darlington New Nuclear Project.

“This approval is a historic milestone for Ontario and Canada. The Darlington Small Modular Reactor (SMR) will be the first of its kind in the G7, helping to power our growing province with reliable, affordable, and emissions-free energy.

The Darlington New Nuclear Project could create up to 17,000 Canadian jobs during construction, contribute over $15 billion to Canada’s GDP, and drive $500 million annually into our supply chain because our government has insisted and successfully negotiated that local Ontario and Canadian businesses must be overwhelmingly used to build SMRs for the world.

Ontario is realizing its potential as a stable democratic energy superpower, and I look forward to sharing next steps for this exciting project in the coming weeks.”
Click to expand...
That's....alot sooner than I expected. what would the timeline look like now?
 
First Small Modular Reactor in G7 with construction under and two crawler cranes, multiple shoring rigs and one tower crane @Paclo @interchange42


From CTV News
IMG_0092.jpeg
 
innsertnamehere said:
This the first SMR in the world from what I recall
Click to expand...
I believe Britain just signed off on one, much to the American’s annoyance, reportedly.

uk.news.yahoo.com

US criticises Britain over nuclear reactor proposals

ambassador to London on Wednesday attacked Britain's approach to nuclear power in an unusually strong criticism on the eve of an expected decision on ‌the development of a site in north Wales. Britain is expected on Thursday to announce its first small ‌modular reactor (SMR) nuclear power...
uk.news.yahoo.com uk.news.yahoo.com
 
Admiral Beez said:
I believe Britain just signed off on one, much to the American’s annoyance, reportedly.

uk.news.yahoo.com

US criticises Britain over nuclear reactor proposals

ambassador to London on Wednesday attacked Britain's approach to nuclear power in an unusually strong criticism on the eve of an expected decision on ‌the development of a site in north Wales. Britain is expected on Thursday to announce its first small ‌modular reactor (SMR) nuclear power...
uk.news.yahoo.com uk.news.yahoo.com
Click to expand...
This US Administration is acting like an over-opinionated neighbour/aunt/uncle that likes to scold everyone and can't understand why they don't see the world like they do. The reality is pretty much everybody is trying to do what they can to break away from US influence and they seem to honestly not get it.
 
lenaitch said:
This US Administration is acting like an over-opinionated neighbour/aunt/uncle that likes to scold everyone and can't understand why they don't see the world like they do. The reality is pretty much everybody is trying to do what they can to break away from US influence and they seem to honestly not get it.
Click to expand...
Agreed, and in good time. It's ridiculous that one country of 340 million people, with only 15% of the Global Purchasing Power (GDP-PPP), burdened with a record $35 trillion in federal debt (125% of GDP) gets to set global policy and influence how countries run their domestic affairs. The US ranks lowest in the G7 in PISA (Math, Reading, and Science Scores) and by far the highest (in G7) for obesity and maternal/infant mortality. American exceptionalism may have had legs in the past, but is now a myth. This sparsely populated, dumb, fat and unhealthy country should not be telling the world's engineers and scientists which nuclear energy projects to pursue.
 
Last edited:
Admiral Beez said:
Agreed, and in good time. It's ridiculous that one country of 340 million people, with only 15% of the Global Purchasing Power (GDP-PPP), burdened with a record $35 trillion in federal debt (125% of GDP) gets to set global policy and influence how countries run their domestic affairs.
Click to expand...
It's up to $38 trillion now. You know what they say, a trillion here, a trillion there, sooner or later it adds up to real money.
 
lenaitch said:
This US Administration is acting like an over-opinionated neighbour/aunt/uncle that likes to scold everyone and can't understand why they don't see the world like they do. The reality is pretty much everybody is trying to do what they can to break away from US influence and they seem to honestly not get it.
Click to expand...
...I think it's a conversation where the adults in the room should only be invited to the table.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top