Toronto CIBC SQUARE | 241.39m | 50s | Hines | WilkinsonEyre

  • Thread starter Suicidal Gingerbread Man
  • Start date
Saturday
CDF1A034-CAA6-4CF3-B7A8-6317892D9433.jpeg
CEB7ED3A-A272-48BA-8055-7E8B01D47103.jpeg
B9FE9164-B144-4E7D-A831-813515ECFD43.jpeg
4EE2D272-D67C-4CC8-93BF-38745CF12F29.jpeg
BBE7B1D3-6FE4-4088-91C7-6A81F85468BE.jpeg
04162A2A-41AF-40F1-B13E-0EAA430DC730.jpeg
 
You know you've reached true big city status when you start building stuff over stuff that's over stuff. In this case, park, over tracks, over streets. Although I suppose we already got there on a smaller scale with the PATH bridge over Lake Shore, under the expressway.
 
Last edited:
wmedia said:
You know you've reached true big city status when you start building stuff over stuff that's over stuff. In this case, park, over tracks, over streets. Although I suppose we already got there on a smaller scale with the PATH bridge over Lake Shore, under the expressway.
Click to expand...
Once we're building stuff under stuff that's over stuff but then under stuff then you know stuffs cookin.
 
wmedia said:
You know you've reached true big city status when you start building stuff over stuff that's over stuff. In this case, park, over tracks, over streets. Although I suppose we already got there on a smaller scale with the PATH bridge over Lake Shore, under the expressway.
Click to expand...

Hmm. Bloor Subway over Don Valley Park (and Parkway) under Danforth. Is there an earlier example of triple stacking without using utilities?
 
Which phase's tower is 241m and which is 238m? It looks like phase 2 on the north side of the tracks is taller but that might purely be because it is at a slightly higher elevation!?
 
They'll look essentially the same height from most angles. I don't think the elevation from one side of the track to the other is that high (though could be mistaken). @Koops65 's 3D model does a pretty good job showing the subtle subtle difference.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top