Very cool set. It include possibly the best image I've ever seen of the large Commerce and Transportation building that was destroyed to make way for the Canada Trust Tower.
The excavation is down to a very dense concrete like material that requires time and effort to break-up. It appears to be a shale or very dense slate and my assumption is that this is the original lake bed.
Very cool set. It include possibly the best image I've ever seen of the large Commerce and Transportation building that was destroyed to make way for the Canada Trust Tower.
Just to be clear, this map does not depict the property involved in the construction of this tower, which is located on the east side of Bay St. The Union Station indicated on this map was located west of the current station.Or, more likely, there were rail lines ON the land and when the berm was built they were not usable so they removed the rails but left the ties. Only way to really know would be to see if they are lying in a pile or are arranged like a railway. From the 1913 Goads it looks as though there were many rail sidings in that area.
View attachment 127550
True, the map I posted earlier is a bit west - the Union Station noted is NOT the current one but the earlier station that was west of the current one. Here is the 1913 map a bit east of the other shot - CIBC Square is really over Bayside Park. No rails exactly there but lots in the area and, as noted elsewhere, the rail ties may actually be 'crib-work' installed while lake-filling.Just to be clear, this map does not depict the property involved in the construction of this tower, which is located on the east side of Bay St. The Union Station indicated on this map was located west of the current station.
I think the dark ground is likely glacial till. Which is basically a mix of rock (possibly shale), sand, etc. It is usually very compact and hard (due to the mix of large rocks, fine dirt and weight of previous glaciers that were on top) for earth but diggable. I doubt that you would encounter shale at this shallow depth as there is a lot of fill on top of what use to be the 'natural' elevation of the land. Further to excavate intact shale you would need a ripper on the back of the dover at a minimum, which i do not see. Most building excavations in TO are in glacial till, even the ones further north that had no fill material placed on them 100 years ago.Wow. Down to the Georgian Bay Shale you think? We got any resident geologists on UT?
View attachment 127907
I think the dark ground is likely glacial till. Which is basically a mix of rock (possibly shale), sand, etc. It is usually very compact and hard (due to the mix of large rocks, fine dirt and weight of previous glaciers that were on top) for earth but diggable. I doubt that you would encounter shale at this shallow depth as there is a lot of fill on top of what use to be the 'natural' elevation of the land. Further to excavate intact shale you would need a ripper on the back of the dover at a minimum, which i do not see. Most building excavations in TO are in glacial till, even the ones further north that had no fill material placed on them 100 years ago.