junctionist
Senior Member
Every new building is a variation of a glass box, and no matter how many different panels of frosted glass they insert into the design, or how many straight edges architects can find in a rectangular podium box, brick and mortar will always have that classy, classic, and charismatic feel that most boxes lack (B/A Centre, RBC Centre, Ritz, Festival, CityPlace, MLS, Telus, Murano.....)
I don't have a hate-on for modern glass buildings, but enough is enough. This 'Chicago' building should have been built downtown.
Twenty years from now, we're going to look back and think, "Jesus, someone should have regulated how much green glass was built in the 2000's".
I much prefer if we regulated how much brick and precast neo-eclectic architecture went up in Mississauga. This building just links Mississauga with the "comfort food" architecture of the likes of Atlanta. Plus there are the cultural implications of building faux-Chicago towers downtown. Frankly, it would be kind of embarrassing.
khristopher said:Mississauga City Centre is not suburban at all. You don't seem to realize that most of Toronto is suburban in nature, just like any other major city in the world. Mississauga is no different. MCC is also in transition. It is a very young city, and in a huge change right now. It's kind of like a kid who is now a teenager.
So if most of Toronto is suburban, then MCC is not suburban? It's dense and is becoming more urban, but it's geographically in the suburbs. Suburbs can be dense and function just like an old urban city.