Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
Cherry Place 
55 Eastern Ave, Toronto
Developer: Options for Homes, Rekai Centres

Cherry Place | 95m | 29s | Options for Homes | Montgomery Sisam | Page 2

Discussion in 'Buildings' started by interchange42, Jun 16, 2017.

  1. ChesterCopperpot

    ChesterCopperpot Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,008
    Likes Received:
    2,504
    Location:
    Toronto
    My bad - he's on the regular DRP - not the WT
     
    #16

  2. AlvinofDiaspar

    AlvinofDiaspar Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    23,808
    Likes Received:
    9,282
    Location:
    Toronto
    #17
  3. innsertnamehere

    innsertnamehere Superstar

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    10,805
    Likes Received:
    3,964
    Location:
    Hipsterville
    I'd like to see more retail uses on ground level.. move the kitchen and other Long term care related facilities to the second level..
     
    #18
  4. Toronto1834

    Toronto1834 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2017
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    100
    I will be interested to see if the panel comments on the fact that the height is 3x what the secondary plan allows. Will they be less stringent because it is affordable housing? Does the building need to be a minimum of 29 storeys because the politicians determined how many affordable housing units they wanted to fit on the site?
     
    #19
    mcornett likes this.
  5. AlvinofDiaspar

    AlvinofDiaspar Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    23,808
    Likes Received:
    9,282
    Location:
    Toronto
    Honestly though I am totally ok with it - it's going to be right by a Relief Line stop.

    AoD
     
    #20
    greenleaf likes this.
  6. mcornett

    mcornett Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    267
    Can’t say I’m for the tower portion of this proposal. It’s too tall for the area. It doesn’t conform to the secondary plan and we chopped down 18 Eastern to 12 storeys, so why does this get more? It also overwhelms the historic school to the north. Also I thought we were past large, 100% affordable housing buildings as a planning concept.
     
    #21
    janschot and Toronto1834 like this.
  7. AlvinofDiaspar

    AlvinofDiaspar Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    23,808
    Likes Received:
    9,282
    Location:
    Toronto
    Because there are only so many sites available for affordable housing, and it is imperative that we expand the supply? Plus this is "affordable" as in relatively cheap to purchase for a segment that is not well served by the private sector, not RGI housing.

    AoD
     
    #22
  8. maestro

    maestro Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    6,171
    Likes Received:
    1,266
    Can't we have a mid rise community without a tall tower proliferating it? The other tall towers are more or less around the perimeter.
    It's also Options for Homes. They build condos that are usually 20% cheaper than market rates (not that affordable really) and they are all duds in appearance.
     
    #23
    mcornett likes this.
  9. ADRM

    ADRM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    6,265
    I would be very disappointed if there was no tower on this site.
     
    #24
  10. interchange42

    interchange42 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    20,227
    Likes Received:
    11,293
    Location:
    by the Humber
    Proliferating is not the word you want, not sure which one you do though. This tower is on the perimeter of the West Don Lands too, so not sure what that point means either, unless you simply mean taller than anything adjacent to it.

    20% cheaper than normal is a big deal, particularly when there aren't too many options for getting 30, 40, or 50% off market. Just what do you suggest?

    I'd like to see Options get as much density here as makes sense. I don't know if that means 29 storeys exactly or if there's another height which would make more sense by some metric or other—the planners can hammer out the numbers—but if they aren't putting up the Taj Mahal here, boohoo: there's an affordable housing crisis in this city, and when weighing Option's architectural legacy against the average Toronto condo developer, there's no guarantee of an aesthetic triumph in comparison. This is on a streetcar line, may be close to a subway station in the future, doesn't look like it will cast onerous shadows on nearby low-rise homes, so let's go crazy, let's build something substantial here!

    42
     
    #25
    Lenser, greenleaf, Eastended and 5 others like this.

Share This Page