Cinnamon
Active Member
Reports Suggest Porter Airlines Is Embraer’s Mystery E2 Customer:
simpleflying.com
So Porter is moving to Pearson then?Reports Suggest Porter Airlines Is Embraer’s Mystery E2 Customer:
![]()
Reports Suggest Porter Airlines Is Embraer's Mystery E2 Customer
simpleflying.com
So Porter is moving to Pearson then?
They could use Ottawa or Montreal (or even Waterloo) as a hub for long distance trips too. Continue using dash-8's within Toronto/triangle and offer connections in Montreal for longer distance trips to Florida, carribean, central america.
They might even make a Vancouver/Hawaii and Halifax/Manchester trips as they're just within range.
I think someone's credibility just got the flush.I might be totally wrong here, but I googled it and got an impression that A220 are turboprops.
In any case, their speed is quoted as 829 kph typical, 871 kph max. That's about 100-150 kph below the typical speed of the large transatlantic jets in service now.
I don't think they'd be going for a jet with an astonishingly low runway length requirement if they were planning to move to Pearson..So Porter is moving to Pearson then?
I love how no one replied or corrected them because they were just so flabbergasted.I think someone's credibility just got the flush.
It will be very tight...the E2 needs 3979 ft to get upI don't think they'd be going for a jet with an astonishingly low runway length requirement if they were planning to move to Pearson..
E2 should be able to land at Toronto Island now with currently published lengths and requirements. And presumably would be popular with locals given they are quieter than what Porter is currently flying.
| Dimensions: | 3988 x 150 feet. | |
|---|---|---|
| Surface: | ||
| Remarks | grooved ASPH | |
| Runway 08 | Runway 26 | |
| Runway Heading: | 082° | 262° |
| Approach Lights | Visual Alignment Guidance System and Runway ID Lights (Rotating Beacons) | |
| Glide Slope Indicator | PAPI for aircraft with eye-to-wheel height up to 10 feet., APAPI - Abbreviated PAPI for aircraft with eye-to-wheel height up to 10 feet. |
I don't think they'd be going for a jet with an astonishingly low runway length requirement if they were planning to move to Pearson..
E2 should be able to land at Toronto Island now with currently published lengths and requirements. And presumably would be popular with locals given they are quieter than what Porter is currently flying.
And so it should be. I hear the turboprops approaching the airport. I'll fight to ban turboprops in favour of quieter jets when there are quieter options! Who wouldn't?I'm not sure it would matter. As soon as the word "jet" appears, the battle would be on.
If we're going to keep BB, might as well lengthen to runways to make it useful for jets.I'm not sure it would matter. As soon as the word "jet" appears, the battle would be on.
I think he/she is referring to the fact that as soon as residents hear the word "jet", there will be vast protests against jets landing in Billy Bishop simply because they are jets.And so it should be. I hear the turboprops approaching the airport. I'll fight to ban turboprops in favour of quieter jets when there are quieter options! Who wouldn't?
I'd assume that Ontario and Canada would have to amend the agreement. I can't see Ontario fighting hard against this, currently. And the current government has made it very clear it's willing to overrule the city on almost any issue.(iii) The Tripartite Agreement (1983) prohibits the use of "jets" regardless of their noise profile (other than emergencies).
(iv) The Tripartite Agreement (1983) prohibits the addition of runways or extension to runways. On the other hand, apparently PortsToronto is still trying its chance; here