I know -- I just didn't know how to do the accent.Touché not Touche. Touche would rhyme with toosh.
I know -- I just didn't know how to do the accent.Touché not Touche. Touche would rhyme with toosh.
By the way, the OP is one of the best informed guys around here and I have always found his posts well worth the little bit of extra time to figure out the occasionally inventive spelling. So take it easy. When's the last time YOU told me something I needed to know? Except how to spell of course. That's really helpful.
Can't we just let the topic die ... I'd have thought my comment about the accent aigu would have said the same with humour.Besides, I'm trying to be helpful. Now he'll know the proper word to use. It's always half. And he'll never make the same mistake again. And everyone is happy.
Can't we just let the topic die ... I'd have thought my comment about the accent aigu would have said the same with humour.
Some people get mental blocks ... for some reason your/you're its/it's and their/there get me if I'm just typing without thinking, even though I'm well aware of the rules ... I'm sure others have their own quirks - but if it's not changing the meaning of what's written (such using a verb tense that changes the meaning) then I ain't seeing the reason why we'd worry about this.
It was clear from your original post you knew what he meant. It's not like that usage isn't unheard of ... (and if you don't believe me, check how many google hits you get for the phrase "cut it in haft" or "cut in haft").How does it not change the meaning when the word usage is wrong and you just have to guess what a person is trying to say? Language should be clear, not confusing.
We can only hope.But whatever. I'm sure these posts will get deleted for being off-topic anyway.
If I read the report to the Executive Committee correctly, BIXI's current loan guarantee ($4,800,000) runs to 2020 and there is nothing in the report to say it could not be increased. What they want to do is limit the TOTAL amount of these guarantees. See: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-38941.pdf
That's what the staff report said but the politicians do not always listen to staff. From the NP blog post: "The executive voted to phase out existing capital loan guarantees for non-city agencies, boards and commissions, as they expire."
You're right that Bixi got an agreement to 2020 (smart Bixi). Many of the others expire in 2014 or 2015. Something to think about when we go to the polls...
I got to say this Mayor is hilarious to bloviate about loan guarantees while pushing his private sector solution to the Sheppard subway. If that happens it will be the biggest loan guarantee in Canadian history. (Bigger than GM if you subtract the pension fund bailout.)