Full credit to
@James1256 for flagging the resubmission; I will now add some additional material.
First, the Cover Letter from June summing up the changes:
Then, the Revised Stats from the Addendum to the Planning Report:
More discussion from the above:
Revised Site Plan:
Comments:
While the park isn't completely useless at 15,000ft2 in size, it's still not the right way to handle parkland in this area. This should be an offsite acquisition to expand nearby parks in order to add needed amenities. A modest tot-lot could still be situated on site.
Parking has declined by over 100 resident spaces even as unit totals are up +392 (not a bad thing at all)
2 of the towers have seen their floor plates come down to under 800m2
The other 2 have not.
Still no retail at-grade
***
The big win here is all the parking going underground; but this still needs significant further revision to be remotely decent.
Parks, and Retail remain clear sore points.
Elevator Ratio as amended:
Building A/B .87 elevators per 100 units
Building C/D: .93 elevators per 100 units
(both buildings have 12 elevators, six per tower)
@Art Tsai ; another one for ya
