greenleaf
Senior Member
I wonder if they are trying to push this through before the folks in 77 Charles move in and realize what is happening. It appears this development and 77 will be about 15m apart.
I wonder if they are trying to push this through before the folks in 77 Charles move in and realize what is happening. It appears this development and 77 will be about 15m apart.
I wonder if they are trying to push this through before the folks in 77 Charles move in and realize what is happening. It appears this development and 77 will be about 15m apart.
I dont favour this development. The level of intensification in this area is getting out of control. The streets are tiny and the neighbourhood is getting overwhelmed -
- The St Thomas (on hold, but scale is approved)
- 1 St Thomas
- 77 Charles
- U Condos X 2
- Lorreto College
These buildings are within yards of one another. Loretto College is a decent sized building as it is, and rather fine looking. I dont see why he college should be allowed to jam more condos in there. And I've ignored the Charles apartments at Bay.
I'm talking about sightlines and sunlight. Residents in any neighbourhood need to accomodate intensification. At the same time they ought to have some rights, and the burden should be shared. Even Cityplace has much more breathing room.
Preliminary report from the March 20 TEYCC:
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-45664.pdf
AoD
did they update the proposal sign on the property?
Also, balconies for the student residences? Unnecessary and a bad idea.