Neil
Active Member
The sidewalks are so narrow here, I always thought a woonerf style of streetscape would be appropriate.
Patience my friend. That is what is being planned - similar to Market Street.The sidewalks are so narrow here, I always thought a woonerf style of streetscape would be appropriate.
The Leader Lane pedestrianization would be a great change however there is some local opposition to those plans due to noise concerns. Time will tell.Colborne from Church to Leader Lane MAY be fixed up this fall but more likely in spring 2022. Leader Lane from King to Colborne will be done at same time and there are plans to fully pedestrianise Leader Lane south from Colborne to Wellington at same time too. Colborne from Leader Lane to Yonge will, supposedly, be done when the new development at corner of Yonge is finished (it's not started yet so that means 5+ years more.)
The local objections re Leader Lane were to a proposed PATIO there. As far as I know, 'everyone'(BIA, SLNA, neighbours) are in favour of a pedestrianization. Plans still being worked on and it will certainly not happen in 2021 Transportation has been instructed to work on it and this motion was passed at TEYCC in May.The Leader Lane pedestrianization would be a great change however there is some local opposition to those plans due to noise concerns. Time will tell.
Are there any details on what is specifically planned for Colborne? A straight re-pave or something more aesthetically pleasing?
The plan for Colborne from Church to Leader Lane and the northern leg of Leader Lane is NOT a simple repaving. Something similar to Market Street is planned and will either happen late fall 2021 or, more likely, spring 2022. (They need to finish 65 King first.)
That's why Council passed the new King-Parliament Secondary Plan, which will help with actually preserving the three-dimensionality of heritage buildings and direct development to reinforce the identity of the district, although it might be appealed to the LPAT.Valid point but is it a realistic expectation that the low rise heritage buildings to the south will remain as is? In Toronto, buildings like that get gutted so that tall modern buildings can rise from within. If they can gut the Concourse Building and propose to do the same to the Dominion Public Building, modest 3-4 floor buildings from that same era don't stand a chance.
Usually we just end up with an exterior wall as a nod to what once stood there. It's a rarity that they keep them intact and build adjacent instead.
I think an appeal (or ten) to LPAT is to be assumed!That's why Council passed the new King-Parliament Secondary Plan, which will help with actually preserving the three-dimensionality of heritage buildings and direct development to reinforce the identity of the district, although it might be appealed to the LPAT.
We all look like porta-potties when we get old...Tom Jones looks like a porta-potty now.