55C: 55 Charles Condos | 167m | 50s | MOD Developments | a—A

LUVIT!

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
946
This is a very odd collection of geometry is it not? I think it is shown 'ugly' on purpose as a tease of better things to come.
 

AlbertC

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
20,111
Reaction score
51,149
Location
Davenport
Reminds me of the movie, Interstellar where McConaughey was stuck in that tesseract bookshelf scene:

akos-halasz-interstellar9.jpg


https://www.artstation.com/artwork/EJODA
 

greenleaf

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
2,678
Reaction score
1,906
Location
Downtown
Like the small wild range of ornate details you’d find on a Victorian row house in Cabbagetown, it feels like aA is taking that concept on a larger skyscraper scale. Seems like that idea is almost done taking shape at 60 Colborne and now they are doing it here in a different way.

I like how it breaks up the height of the tower into what feels like manageable pieces.
 

Ramako

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
4,654
Reaction score
861
Location
Toronto, ON
Yeah. 60 Colbourne's a big failure, right? :rolleyes:

Don't get me wrong - they're still one of the better firms out there, but they used to produce nothing but hits. Now they've got comparative duds like Halo, Alter, 8 Cumberland, 33 Yorkville and this one popping up on a more regular basis.
 

TheKingEast

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
6,360
Reaction score
3,718
Don't get me wrong - they're still one of the better firms out there, but they used to produce nothing but hits. Now they've got comparative duds like Halo, Alter, 8 Cumberland, 33 Yorkville and this one popping up on a more regular basis.

I agree with you. Been saying this for a while and got flamed. The pack has caught up.
 

Top