Toronto 35 Holmes | 58.24m | 17s | Maniad | Icon

[PMT]

35 HOLMES AVE
Ward 23 - North York District

►View All Properties

Combined Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendment

Proposed Use --- # of Storeys 18 # of Units 154

Applications:
Type Number Date Submitted Status
OPA & Rezoning 18 104519 NNY 23 OZ Jan 12, 2018 Under Review

 

[Edward Skira]

It's about time.

 

[junctionist]

The site looks like a little slice of Wasaga Beach in the heart of the city in that street view shot.

 

[PMT]

I'm not liking the blank walls at all:

 

[Rupert Pumpkin]

It's good to see this many 2/2+ bedrooms.

 

[PMT]

source

 

[Marcanadian]

Refusal report to be considered by North York Community Council next week:

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.NY31.5

 

[Edward Skira]

Community Information Meeting

Monday July 9 at 7PM
Council Chamber, North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street.

 

[Edward Skira]

 

[Amare]

One thing is certain here; this doesnt look like it will be Iconic in any way, shape, or form.

 

[PMT]

New docs posted February 8:

Development Applications

City Planning COA Application Information Center

app.toronto.ca

Revised proposal for LPAT hearing: a 17-storey residential building with a 2-level underground parking garage total GFA of 10.717.30m2 (FSI 4.51) with a 96 vehicle parking spaces. Note, the tower with shift slightly to the east to increase the west side yard setback to 10 metres.

 

[Undead]

Shame the developer was unable to purchase that house--would have made for a better parcel. That owner missed their chance to sell. When this building goes up, their house will lose its development potential. Its value also takes a hit in the eyes of anyone in the market for a detached house. Not exactly fun being right beside a large building with windows staring into your backyard.

 

[Msleylar]

This has been approved by the OLT:

https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/pl200309-Aug-05-2021.pdf

 

[Northern Light]

This has been approved by the OLT:

https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/pl200309-Aug-05-2021.pdf

From the decision:

The Appellant has also agreed to a commitment for traffic demand measures and a contribution of $50,000
towards a bicycle sharing initiative.

Not sure if this is something novel, or funding for a Bikeshare Toronto station.

*****

This is the sort of thing that gets the City in trouble:

The set-back was being asked for next to a site on which a tall building is not feasible.

 

[ProjectEnd]