hard to define because it has a little bit of everything and not so much of its own. US, UK, France, even Asia. Yes, I agree that Canadian culture is somewhat different from American culture, but the similarity is like 85%. There is difference but not enough to make it stand out, like the French are different from the Germans, or the Japanese different from the Chinese.
The French are culturally similar to the Germans throughout the Alsace and Lorraine regions. They are also very similar to the Italians along the Mediterranean coast and throughout Provence. In the northwest they share traditional languages and culture with the British... and of course there is a shared 'European' identity common all across Europe. If you're implying that a nation having 'a little bit of everything' precludes any common national identity you are completely wrong. Strong regional and national identities often co-exist, along with very localized ones in some smaller countries. This is the same in the USA and the same in China, I'm sure, where there are enormous linguistic and cultural differences from one region to another. In fact, what is China but an artificially imposed identify over disparate peoples?? What are most countries if not artificial collectivities with fairly arbitrary borders??
Is it because "we just view it as the way we live while an outsider may be able to define it easier"? good try but hardly. I am sure ask any Italian or Chinese, they will have no trouble telling all about what their country is about and how it is different from the rest of the world. And plus, most outsiders are NOT able to define it either, not just Canadians.
Not true at all. People around the world have a very clear perception of Canada and Canadians and it is remarkably different than the perception they have of America. You only have to travel abroad with an American flag on your backpack to understand this!
... and Italians are notoriously 'un-unified' in how they perceive their identity, by the way. A Roman is a Roman first and foremost, a Tuscan a Tuscan, and so on. Again, the very notion of Italian 'nationhood' is fairly modern and fairly artificial.
Many have said "American friends" telling them how Canadian culture is vastly different from American culture, as if it is solid evidence. I am sure they are just being polite and nice. Why would an American friend you are familiar rudely say "you guys have no culture and everything is basically borrowed from us"? It is like your friend will also say your kid is cute and smart. Why do they want to offend you any way?
Trust me, my partner (with whom I am married) is not that polite!
Look, for somebody who claims he can pick out a Japanese person from a Chinese person on sight you seem remarkably unable to see or unwilling to acknowledge subtle differences anywhere else, quite frankly, and herein lays the problem with this debate: you refuse to want to acknowledge a Canadian identity because that would mean acknowledging some connection to this place (beyond your passport), and clearly you don't want to do that.
But as a Canadian, when you travel to or live in urban US, do you really experience some sort of "culture shock"? Seriously? I have lived a large city in both country, and I am confident to say the similarities (85%) completely overwhelms the differences (15%) when everything considered.
You keep insisting on the comparison between the US and Canada, that it somehow negates the existence of a Canadian identity as an original entity. You are wrong. America doesn't pre-exist Canada (and I'm not talking 1776 vs 1867 here). We share a common historic ancestry with Britain, a language, and a western lifestyle and culture, no question, but these aren't things that define the Canadian collectivity. As has been pointed out here many times these things are shared all around the world. If you're looking for 'culture shock' you may have far to go to find it in this age of globalization, mass media and cultural imperialism!
One way for Canada to develop its own culture is to stop relying on American culture so habitually every single day (of course stop speaking English would be the best efficient way but not possible), ranging from P&G consumer goods to what you watch and listen on the media. Second is to start considering the US as simply foreign country like the rest of the world (cut the umbilical cord). The US should not be the benchmark of everything we do, there is the rest of the world. There are many small-big neighbouring countries and I have never seem one dependent on the other like Canada does on the US.
Just to rock your boat: Our proximity to the USA is indeed part of our shared reality and part of what informs Canadians from coast to coast, like it or not. Wars in North America throughout the 18th century and early 19th century formed our borders and allegiences and they haven't changed over the centuries... and since then Canada is in the unique position of being a sovereign, independent nation alongside the political, economic and cultural behemoth that is the USA. This informs who we are and there is no denying it. As Trudeau said, living next to the USA is like sleeping with an elephant in that you can't ignore its existence and any move it makes is going to effect you big time!! So, it isn't so much we define ourselves by America but America's presence is part of what defines us... in other words, I may live by the sea and its proximity may shape me but it doesn't mean I am of the sea, obviously.