TrickyRicky
Senior Member
whoaccio, while I agree any games should be centrally located I disagree that it is negative to have facilities spread out in the GTA. If the objective of the games is to promote and improve sport and sporting excellence in the region why doesn't it make sense to have top level facilities in different areas with different specialties?
With regard to the Olympics, I'll say it again, Beijing has totally turned me off of the Olympics. The media coverage was a nit-picking bitch fest, largely reducing the return on investment for the money spent on exposure. The revenue generated externally for positive long-term improvements to the city was insignficant relative to the amount Chinese tax-payers were saddled with.
I've tried to take a philosophy where initiative is deemed precious, meaning if someone wants to organize or implement something that is roughly positive, never work against them. But in the case of the Olympics I would consider breaking this rule and actively campaigning against a Toronto bid.
With regard to the Olympics, I'll say it again, Beijing has totally turned me off of the Olympics. The media coverage was a nit-picking bitch fest, largely reducing the return on investment for the money spent on exposure. The revenue generated externally for positive long-term improvements to the city was insignficant relative to the amount Chinese tax-payers were saddled with.
I've tried to take a philosophy where initiative is deemed precious, meaning if someone wants to organize or implement something that is roughly positive, never work against them. But in the case of the Olympics I would consider breaking this rule and actively campaigning against a Toronto bid.