News   Jun 26, 2024
 187     0 
News   Jun 26, 2024
 348     0 
News   Jun 26, 2024
 441     0 

The World in 25 years?

What will the world look like by 2025?


  • Total voters
    40
In 25 years Canada will still be one of the best countries to live in and most prosperous nations in the world. This will occur despite the people of this country and government that represents them not because of them. Canada is quite literally prosperity for dummies, too easy of a good thing to possibly fail.
 
I was going to vote in this poll but I didn't, because 1) I didn't know what a "dominat power" was, and 2) I didn't see any option involving the words "hell" and "handbasket" which would reflect my expectations most accurately.
 
I didn't know what a "dominat power" was,
The term "Dominat" refers to the second of the two phases of government of the Roman Empire. The term comes from the Latin dominus. Here's a good explanation http://www.speedylook.com/Dominat.html

I believe though that this poll was established utilizing poor spelling ability, not an expertise in Latin or Roman politics.
 
poor spelling and grammar built this language.
True, but do you want to be the language pioneer whose resume gets thrown in the trash for lack of accurate spelling?

A few years ago I was leading the hiring process at a large Canadian corporation. We needed a new entry level, management stream person. Before I looked at any resume, I had the office manager go through each and toss out all resumes with one or more spelling or grammar errors. My thinking was that if you can't be bothered to take care with how you represent yourself, you won't do a great job representing the company.

Speak to any HR manager or gatekeeper, and they'll tell you that poor spelling and grammar will kill your chances.
 
People who can spell could make great employees I grant that. But I bet the bulk of the greatest minds, innovators, leaders and entrepreneurs in this world can't spell if their life depended on it. So I agree that spelling and grammar are important issues in their place (such as on a resume). However, the failure in character is the failure to discern where care is appropriate. If you believe spelling and grammar should be perfect everywhere always is this not actually a failure of character measured by the same yard stick but in the opposite fashion?
 
Good points definitely. For the record, I do not believe that spelling and grammar should be perfect everywhere always, and certainly make spelling errors myself, usually out of laziness or inattention. What I am suggesting is that we recognize the unintended impact that spelling errors can have.

Certainly some of our greatest minds were terrible writers. Albert Einsten's writing was incomprehensibly awful, for example. However, we need to remember that for every great mind, there are plenty more folks just trying to get a foot hold into middle class career paths, and an inability to communicate (or willingness to the a language pioneer) can sink your chances.
 
Certainly some of our greatest minds were terrible writers. Albert Einsten's writing was incomprehensibly awful, for example. However, we need to remember that for every great mind, there are plenty more folks just trying to get a foot hold into middle class career paths, and an inability to communicate (or willingness to the a language pioneer) can sink your chances.

Einstein was not a poor writer. This myth persists for some odd reason. Maybe what is being confused here is his problems in completing his entrance exam for university. The written exam was in French, which Einstein had trouble with. However, he was sixteen, and the Swiss university he applying to had a minimum entry age of eighteen.

Somehow this has morphed into Einstein being a lousy writer.
 
Apparently the US will break up in 2010 :)
MOSCOW -- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.

In recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger."

Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.

But it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.

A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker. During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.

Mr. Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet Union."

Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr. Panarin's theories don't hold water.

Mr. Panarin's résumé includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.

The professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics, and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."

In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.

"When I pushed the button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated, hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."

At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.

He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.

"It would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly grin.

Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's role as a global financial regulator.

Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

The article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof. Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.

For Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to very carefully," he says.

The professor says he's convinced that people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.
P1-AO116_RUSPRO_NS_20081228191715.gif
It almost seems like the Prof has never visited the USA at all... Alabama going Mexican? Idaho Chinese?
 
Or for that matter, the Plains states going Canadian? That's contrary to the whole United States of Canada versus Jesusland mapping rationale...
 
It's also not entirely clear why Canada would want 40+ million Americans.
 
Hasn't some Russian political scientist predicted this every year since World War 2?
 
I have seen various studies before that are *ahem* less extreme than the one above - that various sub-regions of the US are indeed drifting apart culturally, politically and economically.

California is the one most presented as going independent - in fact, its laws, local culture, heck, even its infrastructure differs from the US in many ways (what other state uses cut-out US highway shields?), but not so much a quick disintegration, but a slow move towards autonomy. New England would be the next closest to drifting.

But Canada to absorb states like Ohio, Illinois and Colorado? Yikes! We may get Chicago, but we'd also get these guys:

vlcsnap-1208220.jpg


DickCheney.jpg


1160387377_1761.jpg


2eatmk4.jpg


And the wonderful denizens of places like Laramie, Wyoming.
 
It seems the professor just drew arbitrary boundaries to split the US in 4 parts and modeled the nearest influencer on the country or continent that happens to be immediately adjacent (or across an ocean) from it.

Utah under Chinese influence made me laugh especially hard.
 

Back
Top