AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
I think the management and owners would take it more seriously if they are paid not in money, but in company stock that would vest in 5 years time.
AoD
AoD
My favourite Sears story involves the mothers' day flyer a few years back (2012?). Lampert forces Sears divisions to compete with one another - some "survival of the fittest" bullshit. So instead of cooperating, they are at each other's throats. When it came time to produce the annual mothers' day flyer in the U.S., the sporting goods division was able to outbid womenswear for the most prominent spots in the flyer. So millions of American homes received a mothers' day flyer from Sears with a front cover promoting BMX bikes for teenage boys.
“These stores didn’t close because they were poor performing. In fact they were good performing stores, they were good markets for us,” said Vincent Power, vice-president of corporate communication at Sears.
“The value for early termination of our lease that we were being offered was significant. In round numbers probably 20 times what we could have made in net profit over the course of that time.”
So... even in a better-performing store, the lease was worth more than two decades of business itself? Even though there doesn't seem to be any immediate candidate to take over the space?
Wow.