animatronic
Senior Member
I haven't been on for a while but I have to laugh at this delusion of Doug Ford savior of the PC party. I will give the Fords something, they are amazing at over-hyping their mediocre influence. Who else can convince themselves and others that an approval rating of 40% is a positive thing? As I said after the election, Doug 34% number was close to a record low percentage wise for a returning Mayor (or Mayor by proxy) Barbara Hall lost her second term but got in the high 30s/low 40s vs Lastman, and Rowlands lost her second term try but at least got 36% of the vote. Doug got lower than Smitherman from the last election (36%) and everyone claimed Smitherman political career was over. Oh and by the way another mayor who lost and went to the PC leadership in John Tory actually got 38% in 2003 more than what Doug had now and didn't translate to any great PC party wins. The Ford fanatics and cheerleaders are so delusional in reality.
There's been two full provincial election which the Fords were front and centre in the city and not shy in endorsing the PC candidate that resutls to literally zero victories. There was by-election in "Ford strong" Scarborough with Ford pushing the PC candidate in again resulting to nothing. The only "win" came by Doug Holyday who won his by-election but he was so established even before Ford, and lost the seat quickly back when the full scale election happened.
Btw how did the Ford nation council candidates do? Remember the guys under the "Ford banner" that will defeat the current councilors who dare voted to remove "Ford's powers" Did any of them win? Forget winning, did any of them even come close to being a contender against the established candidate? Even a guy Cusimano (a Ford nation guy) who had a strong 2010 showing was a non factor this time around.
Again the delusion of the Fords and their promoters is just too much. In a system that's really easy to win re-election on a second term for a Mayor (Miller had 57% re-election, Lastman 80%). The Ford lost BAD, it only "looked" close because of a strong third-place candidate in Chow who got 23% (the normal strong 3rd place candidate gets around 10-12%) The Fords were campaigning for four years, had the incumbent advantage (that every councilor who wanted to get re-elected did, with the exception of one) and still lost with a lesser second place showing in percentage of vote than Smitherman, Tory in 03, Hall in 97 and Rowlands before her. Yet he and his talking heads walk around like he accomplished something. Yeah he did accomplished something, he got the lowest percentage of vote for a administration losing their attempt for a second term since at least the 80s (how far I bothered to look back to)
Subways.