At this stage of the game is a 'hate-on' for the Liberals really that outlandish, or a distrust at the very least? Remember what happened to the federal Liberals when they were left unchecked in power for too long? As cautionary tales are EHealth and OLG not compelling enough for you at the provincial level? No parties are sqeaky clean, I grant you, but Smitherman just reaks by association... and in this context I hardly think this is some sort of unfair 'hate' for or targeting of Smitherman's Liberal Party background. Seems like fair dues to me!
I believe it's fair to hate the Ontario Liberals for Ontario elections. If John Tory was running would he be accountable for the PC's actions?
I hold Smitherman responsible for actions he had direct control over. He is in directly responsible for part of the eHealth spending (any contracts starting in 2003 to 2008), but he is not responsible for the failure of the Ontario legistature to direct infrastructure funding into electronic filing systems.
In November, 2011, I'll vote on the eHealth and OLG issues. In October, 2010, I'll vote on Toronto issues.
Ford definitely lacks polish where Smitherman is literally slick with it. Not sure who I would trust more. As for tarring candidates with 'broad brush generalities' you seem to be doing it too though, no?
I probably do generalize, but I try to keep it connected directly to an individuals actions. It's not a generality that he was thrown out of the ACC because he was drunk and swearing at kids. It's not a generality that he was charged with assult and then his wife withdrew the charges (complete supposition, but it is law that you cannot be on City Council if you have any jail time). I've never been thrown out of a sporting event, so I don't know what level of abuse is tolerated.
I can agree with Ford's politics, but I can't agree with him on everything else. Then when his politics don't seem to accomplish much (what was the last item of City business that Rob Ford made a difference in?) and most platform positions will change to meet the realities of the job, I cannot support him, and he mainly serves to damage the creditability of being a fiscal conservative candidate.
... yet gay and immigrant people will vote for Ford, and perhaps many it would seem. Why do you feel that other candidates have a 'better' understanding of people? Could one just as equally assume that Smitherman, as a minority urbanite in a same-sex marriage - would be just as out of touch with straight suburban Torontonians? Maybe? Maybe not? Again, no politicians are perfect or squeaky clean, no matter how slick their PR image.
"[AIDS] is very preventable, if you are not doing needles and you are not gay, you wouldn't get AIDS probably, that's bottom line. How are women getting it? Maybe they are sleeping with bisexual men." - Rob Ford, June 2006
If every gay person in Toronto hasn't heard that quote by now, they'll hear it by October 25. I'm sure some can overlook it, but I for one wouldn't want Toronto's disease prevention techniques to reflect that mindset.
If Rob Ford is elected Mayor, how will he marshall the votes to have any affect on Toronto? What is his signature accomplishment from 10 years on City Council? I'm not worried about PR images, I'm worried about how real citizens are viewed and treated.